Zhang Zhe, Dai Yang, Xue Peng, Bao Xue, Bai Xinbo, Qiao Shiyang, Gao Yuan, Guo Xuemei, Xue Yanan, Dai Qing, Xu Biao, Kang Lina
Department of Cardiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Department of Geriatrics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 24;15(1):3045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87828-5.
Angio-based microvascular resistance (AMR) as a potential alternative to the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and its relationship with microvascular obstruction (MVO) and other cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters still lacks comprehensive validation. This study aimed to validate the correlation between AMR and CMR-derived parameters and to construct an interpretable machine learning (ML) model, incorporating AMR and clinical data, to forecast MVO in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We enrolled 452 STEMI patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between 2018 and 2022, who received both PPCI and CMR. After PPCI, AMR measurements and CMR-derived parameters were recorded, and clinical data were gathered. The ML workflow comprised feature selection using the Boruta algorithm, model construction with seven classifiers, hyperparameter optimization via ten-fold cross-validation, model comparison based on the area under the curve (AUC), and a Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis to analyze the significance of different features. 32.29% of patients showed inconsistency between AMR and MVO, but we successfully constructed a predictive model for MVO. Among the classifiers, Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) post hyperparameter optimization displayed superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.911 and 0.846 in the training and validation sets, respectively. SHAP analysis identified AMR as a pivotal predictor of MVO. Although we observed the inconsistency between AMR and MVO but the ML-based construction of MVO prediction model is feasible, which brings the possibility of timely prediction of patients with MVO and timely imposition of interventions during PPCI.
基于血管造影的微血管阻力(AMR)作为微循环阻力指数(IMR)的潜在替代指标,及其与微血管阻塞(MVO)和其他心脏磁共振(CMR)参数的关系仍缺乏全面验证。本研究旨在验证AMR与CMR衍生参数之间的相关性,并构建一个可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,纳入AMR和临床数据,以预测接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的MVO。我们纳入了2018年至2022年间在南京鼓楼医院接受PPCI和CMR检查的452例STEMI患者。PPCI后,记录AMR测量值和CMR衍生参数,并收集临床数据。ML工作流程包括使用Boruta算法进行特征选择、使用七个分类器构建模型、通过十折交叉验证进行超参数优化、基于曲线下面积(AUC)进行模型比较以及进行Shapley加法解释(SHAP)分析以分析不同特征的重要性。32.29%的患者AMR与MVO之间存在不一致,但我们成功构建了MVO预测模型。在分类器中,超参数优化后的极端梯度提升(XGBoost)表现出卓越性能,在训练集和验证集中的AUC分别达到0.911和0.846。SHAP分析确定AMR是MVO的关键预测指标。尽管我们观察到AMR与MVO之间存在不一致,但基于ML构建MVO预测模型是可行的,这为及时预测MVO患者并在PPCI期间及时采取干预措施带来了可能性。