Suppr超能文献

针对非洲的创新型临床试验操作培训项目(ClinOps)的开发、实施与评估。

Development, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative clinical trial operations training program for Africa (ClinOps).

作者信息

Ejigu Dawit Asmamaw, Fekadu Abebaw, Whitty Jeremy, Manyazewal Tsegahun, Nebeta Pamela, Conradie Almari, Okech Brenda, Neequaye Alice, Whitty Sinéad, Lehrman Jennifer, Holt Renee, Birhane Rahel, Vahedi Mahnaz, Demarest Helen, Makonnen Eyasu

机构信息

Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Department of Pharmacology, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06733-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Africa's involvement in clinical trials remains very low. Although the crucial role of training initiatives in building clinical trial capacity in Africa has been documented, current efforts fall short as they lack alignment with local contexts. This study aimed to design, develop, implement, and evaluate an innovative clinical trial operations training program for Africa.

METHODS

We developed ClinOps, a novel 10-week clinical trial operations training program for study coordinators in Africa to enhance their expertise in four fundamental areas: designing, conducting, managing, and reporting clinical trials. To streamline the learning process, we used cloud-based applications that minimize the need for software installations while maximizing student engagement. VoiceThread facilitated interactive content that could be accessed offline. Moodle, an open-source learning management system, offered a platform for sharing learning tools, mentorship, and rubric-driven competency assessments, including quizzes, forums, tutorials, and group assignments. We utilized Zoom for live tutorials and mentoring as required. Effectiveness of the program was evaluated through quantitative pre- and post-surveys, qualitative end-course evaluations, and a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework. The pre- and post-surveys measured changes in trainees' confidence in clinical trial domains and leadership and coordination skills. End-course evaluations gathered feedback on the course content, organization, technology, and instructional methods. We used Wilcoxon rank test to analyze pre- and post-survey scores and thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data.

RESULTS

In the initial cohort, 88 study coordinators from 19 countries participated, including 56 (64%) females, with 57 (65%) actively employed as study coordinators during the training, and 85 (97%) possessing prior experience in clinical trial roles. Among these, 71 (81%) successfully completed the course, with 69 (97%) also completing the post-course assessment. Post-training scores demonstrated substantial improvement compared to pre-training scores in each competency area, including in designing (pre-post training median score = 3.6 vs. 4.6, median difference = 1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.1, p < 0.001), managing (pre-posttest median score = 3.4 vs. 4.2, median difference = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8, p < 0.001), conducting (pre-post training median score = 3.9 vs. 4.7, median difference = 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.0, p < 0.001), and reporting (pre-posttest median score = 3.0 vs. 4.5, median difference = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.5, p < 0.001) clinical trials. The monitoring and evaluation data confirm the program's adherence to training best practices, including alignment with local priorities, country ownership, pedagogic innovation, institutional capacity building, sustainability, and ongoing partnerships. The end-course evaluation reflects participants' positive feedback on the program's structure, content, relevance to their current roles, and overall delivery methods.

CONCLUSION

The ClinOps program, designed by experts from academia and product development partners, enhanced participants' clinical trial competencies. To effectively build clinical trials capacity on the continent, training programs should provide thorough competency development in designing, conducting, managing, and reporting trials.

摘要

背景

非洲参与临床试验的比例仍然很低。尽管已有文献记载培训举措在非洲建设临床试验能力方面的关键作用,但目前的努力仍有不足,因为它们与当地实际情况脱节。本研究旨在为非洲设计、开发、实施和评估一项创新的临床试验操作培训计划。

方法

我们开发了ClinOps,这是一个为期10周的针对非洲研究协调员的新型临床试验操作培训计划,以提高他们在设计、开展、管理和报告临床试验这四个基本领域的专业知识。为简化学习过程,我们使用了基于云的应用程序,尽量减少软件安装需求,同时最大限度地提高学生参与度。VoiceThread提供了可离线访问的交互式内容。Moodle是一个开源学习管理系统,为共享学习工具、指导和基于评分标准的能力评估提供了一个平台,包括测验、论坛、教程和小组作业。我们根据需要利用Zoom进行实时教程和指导。通过定量的课前和课后调查、定性的课程结束评估以及一个全面的监测和评估框架来评估该计划的有效性。课前和课后调查测量了学员在临床试验领域的信心以及领导和协调技能的变化。课程结束评估收集了关于课程内容、组织、技术和教学方法的反馈。我们使用Wilcoxon秩和检验分析课前和课后调查分数,并使用主题分析来分析定性数据。

结果

在初始队列中,来自19个国家的88名研究协调员参与其中,包括56名(64%)女性,57名(65%)在培训期间积极担任研究协调员,85名(97%)拥有临床试验相关工作经验。其中,71名(81%)成功完成课程,69名(97%)也完成了课程后评估。与培训前分数相比,培训后分数在每个能力领域都有显著提高,包括设计(培训前 - 培训后中位数分数 = 3.6对4.6,中位数差异 = 1.0,95%CI 0.8 - 1.1,p < 0.001)、管理(测试前 - 测试后中位数分数 = 3.4对4.2,中位数差异 = 0.6,95%CI 0.4 - 0.8,p < 0.001)、开展(培训前 - 培训后中位数分数 = 3.9对4.7,中位数差异 = 0.9,95%CI 0.6 - 1.0,p < 0.001)和报告(测试前 - 测试后中位数分数 = 3.0对4.5,中位数差异 = 1.0,95%CI 0.9 - 1.5,p < 0.001)临床试验。监测和评估数据证实该计划符合培训最佳实践,包括与当地优先事项保持一致、国家自主权、教学创新、机构能力建设、可持续性以及持续的伙伴关系。课程结束评估反映了参与者对课程结构、内容、与他们当前角色的相关性以及整体授课方式的积极反馈。

结论

由学术界专家和产品开发合作伙伴设计的ClinOps计划提高了参与者的临床试验能力。为了在非洲大陆有效建设临床试验能力,培训计划应在设计、开展、管理和报告试验方面提供全面的能力发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f175/11760708/8f1f1b385ab4/12909_2025_6733_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验