Takahashi Hideo, Berber Eren
Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Feb;9(1):49-58. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.06.08.
With a recent randomized prospective trial revealing that thermal ablative therapy as local tumor control improved overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), thermal ablation continues to remain as an important treatment option in this patient population. Our aim of this article is to review the current role of the ablative therapy in the management of CRLM patients. Main indications for thermal ablation include (I) unresectable liver lesions; (II) in combination with hepatectomy; (III) in patients with significant medical comorbidities or poor performance status (PS); (IV) a small (<3 cm) solitary lesion, which would otherwise necessitate a major liver resection; and (V) patient preference. There are several approaches and modalities for ablative therapy, including open, percutaneous, and laparoscopic approaches, as well as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). Each approach and ablation modality have its own pros and cons. Percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches are preferred due to minimally invasive nature, yet laparoscopic approach has more benefits from thorough intraoperative ultrasound (US) exam as well as complete peritoneal staging with laparoscopy. Similarly, whereas high local tumor failure rate has been a major concern with RFA, MWA or microwave thermosphere ablation (MTA) have demonstrated significantly improved local tumor control due to homogenous tissue heating, ability to reach higher tissue temperatures, and less susceptible to the "heat-sink" effect. Although liver resection is the standard of care for CRLM, there have been some retrospective studies demonstrating similar oncological outcome between ablative therapy and surgical resection in very selected populations with small (<3 cm) solitary CRLM. Lastly, ablative therapy and liver resection should not be mutually exclusive, especially in the management of bilobar liver metastases. Concomitant ablative therapy with hepatectomy may spare the patients from having two-stage hepatectomy with less morbidity. The role of the thermal ablation will continue to evolve in patients with resectable and ablatable lesions owing to newly emerging technology, in addition to new systemic treatment options, including immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).
近期一项随机前瞻性试验显示,热消融治疗作为局部肿瘤控制手段可改善不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者的总生存期(OS),因此热消融仍是这类患者的重要治疗选择。本文旨在综述消融治疗在CRLM患者管理中的当前作用。热消融的主要适应证包括:(I)不可切除的肝脏病变;(II)与肝切除术联合应用;(III)有严重内科合并症或体能状态(PS)较差的患者;(IV)小(<3 cm)的孤立性病变,否则需要进行大范围肝切除;以及(V)患者的偏好。消融治疗有多种方法和方式,包括开放、经皮和腹腔镜途径,以及射频消融(RFA)和微波消融(MWA)。每种方法和消融方式都有其优缺点。经皮和腹腔镜途径因其微创性而更受青睐,但腹腔镜途径在术中通过全面的超声(US)检查以及腹腔镜进行完整的腹膜分期方面有更多优势。同样,虽然RFA一直存在较高的局部肿瘤失败率问题,但MWA或微波热球消融(MTA)由于能实现均匀的组织加热、达到更高的组织温度以及对“热沉”效应不太敏感,已显示出显著改善的局部肿瘤控制效果。尽管肝切除术是CRLM的标准治疗方法,但一些回顾性研究表明,在非常特定的小(<3 cm)孤立性CRLM患者群体中,消融治疗与手术切除的肿瘤学结局相似。最后,消融治疗和肝切除术不应相互排斥,尤其是在双侧肝转移的管理中。肝切除术联合消融治疗可能使患者避免进行分期肝切除术,且发病率更低。由于新技术的出现,以及包括转移性结直肠癌(CRC)免疫治疗在内的新的全身治疗选择,热消融在可切除和可消融病变患者中的作用将继续演变。