• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷砂不同工作参数对树脂复合材料修复粘结强度的影响。

Effect of Different Working Settings of Sandblasting on Resin Composite Repair Bond Strength.

作者信息

Lechte Clemens, Hohmann Erik, Wiegand Annette, Kanzow Philipp

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Endodontology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 12;18(2):313. doi: 10.3390/ma18020313.

DOI:10.3390/ma18020313
PMID:39859784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11766965/
Abstract

To investigate the effect of different sandblasting settings on the shear bond strength (SBS) in the repair of resin composite, specimens (resin composite, enamel, and dentin; each group = 16) were sandblasted by varying the parameters of air pressure (0.2/0.3/0.4 MPa), angle (45/90°), particle size (27/50 μm), tip size (0.8/1.2 mm), and distance (2/5/10 mm) prior to the application of a universal adhesive (Adhese Universal) and resin composite (adhesive area: 7.07 mm). The specimens were subjected to artificial aging (10,000 cycles, 5-55 °C) prior to (resin composite only) and after repair. Groups without mechanical pretreatment and resin composite incremental bond strength served as controls. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVAs, post hoc tests, and Chi-tests ( < 0.05). Only air pressure and distance impacted SBS ( ≤ 0.049). However, resin composite SBS did not differ from the resin composite incremental SBS within all sandblasting settings (positive control: 21.0 ± 5.0 MPa, ≥ 0.566). While sandblasting did not impact bond strength on enamel (control: 20.5 ± 5.1 MPa, ≥ 0.999), most settings resulted in a lower bond strength on dentin (control: 20.1 ± 4.7 MPa, ≤ 0.027). In conclusion, sandblasting significantly improves resin composite repair bond strength, while application parameters are of minor relevance.

摘要

为研究不同喷砂设置对树脂复合材料修复中剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响,在应用通用粘结剂(Adhese Universal)和树脂复合材料(粘结面积:7.07平方毫米)之前,通过改变气压(0.2/0.3/0.4兆帕)、角度(45/90°)、颗粒尺寸(27/50微米)、喷嘴尺寸(0.8/1.2毫米)和距离(2/5/10毫米)等参数对样本(树脂复合材料、牙釉质和牙本质;每组16个)进行喷砂处理。在修复前(仅针对树脂复合材料)和修复后,对样本进行人工老化(10000次循环,5 - 55°C)。未进行机械预处理的组和树脂复合材料增量粘结强度作为对照。使用方差分析、事后检验和卡方检验进行统计分析(P < 0.05)。只有气压和距离对SBS有影响(P ≤ 0.049)。然而,在所有喷砂设置下,树脂复合材料的SBS与树脂复合材料增量SBS并无差异(阳性对照:21.0 ± 5.0兆帕,P ≥ 0.566)。虽然喷砂对牙釉质的粘结强度没有影响(对照:20.5 ± 5.1兆帕,P ≥ 0.999),但大多数设置导致牙本质的粘结强度较低(对照:20.1 ± 4.7兆帕,P ≤ 0.027)。总之,喷砂显著提高了树脂复合材料修复的粘结强度,而应用参数的相关性较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e096/11766965/b8b4c418ee53/materials-18-00313-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e096/11766965/a5fdc264e466/materials-18-00313-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e096/11766965/b8b4c418ee53/materials-18-00313-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e096/11766965/a5fdc264e466/materials-18-00313-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e096/11766965/b8b4c418ee53/materials-18-00313-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Different Working Settings of Sandblasting on Resin Composite Repair Bond Strength.喷砂不同工作参数对树脂复合材料修复粘结强度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 12;18(2):313. doi: 10.3390/ma18020313.
2
Composite Repair on Zirconia: Influence of Different Sandblasting Pretreatments and Various Universal Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength.氧化锆的复合修复:不同喷砂预处理和各种通用粘结剂对剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2025 Apr 16;27:53-64. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.c_1988.
3
Effect of Varying Working Distances between Sandblasting Device and Composite Substrate Surface on the Repair Bond Strength.喷砂装置与复合基底表面之间不同工作距离对修复粘结强度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;14(7):1621. doi: 10.3390/ma14071621.
4
The role of aging and various surface preparation methods in the repair of nanohybrid composites.老化及各种表面处理方法在纳米混合复合材料修复中的作用。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05498-1.
5
[Application of different surface treatment methods in teeth restoration with nano composite resin].
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2020 Dec;29(6):591-595.
6
A randomised controlled study on the effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the immediate repair bond strength and integrity of the repaired resin composite interface.不同表面处理和自酸蚀粘结功能单体对即刻修复粘结强度和修复树脂复合材料界面完整性影响的随机对照研究。
J Dent. 2019 Jun;85:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 1.
7
Effect of Surface Treatments of Polyetherketoneketone as a Post Material on Shear Bond Strength to Root Dentin using Two Types of Resin Cement.聚醚醚酮酮后材料表面处理对两种树脂水门汀与牙本质剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2022 Nov 28;24:435-443. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3608791.
8
Repair Surface Conditioning Measures Affect Enamel and Dentin Bond Strength.修复表面处理措施对牙釉质和牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2020 Nov 1;45(6):643-654. doi: 10.2341/19-270-L.
9
The influence of enamel sandblasting on the shear bond strength and fractography of the bracket-adhesive-enamel complex tested in vitro by the DIN 13990:2017-04 standard.《DIN 13990:2017-04 标准体外测试中喷砂处理对托槽-黏结剂-牙釉质复合体剪切粘结强度和断口形貌的影响》
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jul;23(7):2975-2985. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2692-7. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Effect of Extra Hydrophobic Resin Layer on Bonding of Universal Adhesive Systems to Enamel.额外疏水树脂层对通用粘结系统与牙釉质粘结的影响。
Oper Dent. 2023 Mar 1;48(2):E48-E59. doi: 10.2341/21-140-L.

本文引用的文献

1
Scoping review: Effect of surface treatments on bond strength of resin composite repair.范围综述:表面处理对树脂复合修复体粘结强度的影响。
J Dent. 2024 Jan;140:104737. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104737. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
2
Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials.复合修复体的寿命肯定不仅仅与材料有关。
Dent Mater. 2023 Jan;39(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
3
Risk of failure of repaired versus replaced defective direct restorations in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
恒牙中修复与替换有缺陷的直接修复体的失败风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jul;26(7):4917-4927. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04459-0. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Effect of Varying Working Distances between Sandblasting Device and Composite Substrate Surface on the Repair Bond Strength.喷砂装置与复合基底表面之间不同工作距离对修复粘结强度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;14(7):1621. doi: 10.3390/ma14071621.
5
Repair Surface Conditioning Measures Affect Enamel and Dentin Bond Strength.修复表面处理措施对牙釉质和牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2020 Nov 1;45(6):643-654. doi: 10.2341/19-270-L.
6
Repair of restorations: Adopted by the General Assembly: September 2019, San Francisco, United States of America.修复体的修复:2019年9月于美利坚合众国旧金山获大会通过。
Int Dent J. 2020 Feb;70(1):7-8. doi: 10.1111/idj.12552.
7
Retrospective analysis on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations.修复与替换复合修复体的回顾性分析。
Dent Mater. 2020 Jan;36(1):108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair.大同小异?修复治疗方案的系统评价。
J Dent. 2019 Jul;86:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 May 17.
9
Airborne-particle abrasion; searching the right parameter.空气颗粒磨损;寻找合适的参数。
J Dent Sci. 2018 Dec;13(4):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.通用型胶粘剂的粘结性能:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7-26. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a41975.