Altuğ Yıldırım Ayşenur, Üçtaşlı Mine Betül
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Gazi University, Bişkek St. 1. St. Number: 8 Emek, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05498-1.
Repairing composite resins is a less invasive alternative to complete restoration replacement. To achieve a successful bond between the existing and newly applied composite materials, various surface preparation methods, such as sandblasting and acid etching, have been explored. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a universal nanohybrid composite resin restorative material before and after thermal aging, by utilizing a micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) test.
For the micro-shear bond strength test, a total of 120 cylindrical (3mmX2mm) nanohybrid resin based composite specimens were prepared. The prepared specimens were divided into three groups (n = 40/per group) based on surface treatment methods: a non-aged group, 10,000 thermal cycle aging and 50,000 thermal cycle aging. The aged and non-aged specimens were further divided into four groups according to adhesive application modes and surface pretreatment methods: 1.universal adhesive/self-etch mode, 2.aluminum oxide sandblasting + universal adhesive/self-etch mode, 3.universal adhesive/etch-and-rinse mode, 4.aluminum oxide sandblasting + universal adhesive/etch-and-rinse mode. Subsequently, 0.8mmX2mm disc shape light cure resin based composite specimens were applied with a direct placement technique on the treated surfaces of all samples for repair. µSBS test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were performed for statistical analysis.
The µSBS values of the non-aged group were higher than those of the 10,000 and 50,000 thermal cycle groups, with no significant differences within the non-aged subgroup (p > 0.05). In the aged groups, significant differences were observed between adhesive application modes and surface treatments. Specifically, the etch-and-rinse mode showed higher bond strengths than the self-etch mode after 50,000 thermal cycles (p < 0.05). Sandblasting combined with universal adhesive (self-etch mode) improved bond strength, especially in the 10,000 thermal cycle group (p < 0.05).
Aging reduced the bond strength of composite resin repairs, with the etch-and-rinse mode outperforming the self-etch mode in aged specimens. Sandblasting alone did not enhance bond strength. These findings highlight the importance of considering aging and adhesive strategies to optimize repair outcomes, with further research needed on long-term durability.
修复复合树脂是一种侵入性较小的替代完全修复体更换的方法。为了在现有和新应用的复合材料之间实现成功的粘结,人们探索了各种表面处理方法,如喷砂和酸蚀。本研究的目的是通过微剪切粘结强度(µSBS)测试,评估不同表面处理对通用纳米混合复合树脂修复材料在热老化前后修复粘结强度的影响。
对于微剪切粘结强度测试,共制备了120个圆柱形(3mm×2mm)纳米混合树脂基复合材料标本。根据表面处理方法,将制备的标本分为三组(每组n = 40):未老化组、10000次热循环老化组和50000次热循环老化组。老化和未老化的标本根据粘结剂应用模式和表面预处理方法进一步分为四组:1.通用粘结剂/自酸蚀模式;2.氧化铝喷砂+通用粘结剂/自酸蚀模式;3.通用粘结剂/酸蚀冲洗模式;4.氧化铝喷砂+通用粘结剂/酸蚀冲洗模式。随后,采用直接放置技术,在所有样品的处理表面上施加0.8mm×2mm圆盘形光固化树脂基复合材料标本进行修复。使用万能试验机以1mm/min的十字头速度进行µSBS测试。进行Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney测试进行统计分析。
未老化组的µSBS值高于10000次和50000次热循环组,未老化亚组内无显著差异(p>0.05)。在老化组中,观察到粘结剂应用模式和表面处理之间存在显著差异。具体而言,在50000次热循环后,酸蚀冲洗模式显示出比自酸蚀模式更高的粘结强度(p<0.05)。喷砂结合通用粘结剂(自酸蚀模式)提高了粘结强度,尤其是在10000次热循环组中(p<0.05)。
老化降低了复合树脂修复的粘结强度,在老化标本中,酸蚀冲洗模式优于自酸蚀模式。单独喷砂并不能提高粘结强度。这些发现突出了考虑老化和粘结策略以优化修复结果的重要性,还需要对长期耐久性进行进一步研究。