Anwar Tasrif Ul, Merighe Patrick, Kancharla Rahul Reddy, Kombaiah Boopathy, Kouraytem Nadia
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4130, USA.
Post-Irradiation Examination Department, Materials and Fuels Complex, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2209, USA.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 18;18(2):435. doi: 10.3390/ma18020435.
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is an additive manufacturing process that has gained interest for its material fabrication due to multiple advantages, such as the ability to print parts with small feature sizes, good mechanical properties, reduced material waste, etc. However, variations in the key process parameters in LPBF may result in the instantiation of porosity defects and variation in build rate. Particularly, volumetric energy density (VED) is a variable that encapsulates a number of those parameters and represents the amount of energy input from the laser source to the feedstock. VED has been traditionally used to inform the quality of the printed part but different values of VED are presented as optimal values for certain material systems. An optimal VED value can be maintained by changing the key process parameters so that various combinations yield a constant value. In this study, an optimal constant VED value is maintained while printing SS316L with variable key processing parameters. Porosity analysis is performed using optical microscopy, as well as X-ray computed tomography, to reveal the volume density and distribution of those pores. Two primary defect categories are identified, namely lack of fusion and porosity induced by balling defects. The findings indicate that, even at optimal VED, variations in process parameters can significantly influence defect type, underscoring the sensitivity of defect formation to the variation of these parameters. Furthermore, a minor change in the build rate, driven by adjustments in process parameters, was found to influence defect categories. These findings emphasize that fine tuning the process parameters and build rate is essential to minimize defects. Finally, fiducial marks have been identified as a source of unintentional porosity defects. These results enable the refinement of process parameters, ultimately optimizing LPBF to achieve enhanced material density and expedite the printing.
激光粉末床熔融(LPBF)是一种增材制造工艺,因其在材料制造方面具有诸多优势而受到关注,例如能够打印具有小特征尺寸的零件、具有良好的机械性能、减少材料浪费等。然而,LPBF中关键工艺参数的变化可能会导致气孔缺陷的产生以及成型速率的变化。特别是,体积能量密度(VED)是一个综合了许多这些参数的变量,它代表了从激光源输入到原料的能量。传统上,VED一直用于评估打印零件的质量,但对于某些材料体系,不同的VED值被视为最佳值。可以通过改变关键工艺参数来维持最佳的VED值,以便各种参数组合能产生一个恒定值。在本研究中,在使用可变关键工艺参数打印SS316L时维持了一个最佳恒定VED值。使用光学显微镜以及X射线计算机断层扫描进行气孔分析,以揭示这些气孔的体积密度和分布。识别出了两种主要的缺陷类别,即未熔合和由球化缺陷引起的气孔。研究结果表明,即使在最佳VED值下,工艺参数的变化也会显著影响缺陷类型,这突出了缺陷形成对这些参数变化的敏感性。此外,发现由工艺参数调整驱动的成型速率的微小变化会影响缺陷类别。这些发现强调,微调工艺参数和成型速率对于最小化缺陷至关重要。最后,基准标记已被确定为无意气孔缺陷的一个来源。这些结果有助于优化工艺参数,最终优化LPBF以实现更高的材料密度并加快打印速度。