Candel Ivanna, Wetwittayakhlang Panu, Bessissow Talat, Lakatos Peter L
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 8;14(2):333. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020333.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), encompassing Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD), are chronic inflammatory disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. The association between IBD and colorectal cancer (CRC) is well-documented. Multiple factors have been identified as contributors to the risk of developing CRC in patients with IBD, including duration of disease, disease extension, family history of CRC, co-existance of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and potentially the presence of post-inflammatory polyps (PIPs). PIPs, often referred to as pseudopolyps, are polypoid structures that emerge as a result of severe mucosal inflammation. While their presence has been linked to greater disease severity, the role of PIPs in increasing CRC risk remains controversial. Increasing evidence suggests an association between post-inflammatory polyps (PIPs) and the risk of colorectal neoplasia, with PIPs potentially serving as an indicator of this risk through a history of enhanced inflammation. PIPs may also be linked to a distinct patient phenotype, including the presence of other known risk factors. More recent studies suggest that the risk burden (characterized by a high number or by large polyps) may be important. However, the evidence remains inconsistent, with some studies showing no clear association between PIPs and CRC risk after adjusting for other factors, including histological inflammation. In contrast, the data suggest a low rate of malignant transformation of the PIPs themselves. This narrative review aims to summarize the latest evidence regarding the relationship between PIPs and CRC in IBD, with a focus on UC. While some studies suggest that PIPs may serve as markers of higher disease severity and inflammation, their direct contribution to CRC risk remains unclear. Further research is needed to explore the inflammatory and carcinogenic pathways in patients with PIPs to better understand their role in colorectal cancer (CRC) development.
炎症性肠病(IBD)包括溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD),是影响胃肠道的慢性炎症性疾病。IBD与结直肠癌(CRC)之间的关联已有充分记录。多种因素已被确定为IBD患者发生CRC风险的促成因素,包括疾病持续时间、疾病范围、CRC家族史、原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)的共存以及可能存在的炎症后息肉(PIP)。PIP通常被称为假息肉,是由于严重的黏膜炎症而出现的息肉样结构。虽然它们的存在与更高的疾病严重程度有关,但PIP在增加CRC风险中的作用仍存在争议。越来越多的证据表明炎症后息肉(PIP)与结直肠肿瘤形成风险之间存在关联,PIP可能通过炎症增强史作为这种风险的一个指标。PIP也可能与独特的患者表型有关,包括其他已知风险因素的存在。最近的研究表明风险负担(以数量多或息肉大来表征)可能很重要。然而,证据仍然不一致,一些研究表明在调整其他因素(包括组织学炎症)后,PIP与CRC风险之间没有明确关联。相比之下,数据表明PIP本身的恶性转化率较低。这篇叙述性综述旨在总结关于IBD中PIP与CRC关系的最新证据,重点是UC。虽然一些研究表明PIP可能作为更高疾病严重程度和炎症的标志物,但其对CRC风险的直接贡献仍不清楚。需要进一步研究以探索PIP患者的炎症和致癌途径,以便更好地理解它们在结直肠癌(CRC)发生中的作用。