Al-Zamil Mustafa, Kulikova Natalia G, Shnayder Natalia A, Korchazhkina Natalia B, Petrova Marina M, Mansur Numman, Smekalkina Larisa V, Babochkina Zarina M, Vasilyeva Ekaterina S, Zhhelambekov Ivan V
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Continuing Medical Education, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Department of Restorative Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, Medical Dental Institute, 127253 Moscow, Russia.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 9;14(2):390. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020390.
To date, there have been no studies on the dynamics of areas of pain, paraesthesia and hypoesthesia after the use of various transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of meralgia paresthetica. In this pilot study, we observed 68 patients with obesity-related bilateral meralgia paresthetica. Pain syndrome, paraesthesia symptoms, and hypoesthesia were evaluated using 10-point scores. In addition, pain drawing (PD) was used to determine the area of the spatial distribution of pain syndrome and paraesthesia symptoms, and body drawing was used to determine the area of hypoesthesia. Sham TENS was performed in the control group, and effective TENS was performed in the treatment group. The treatment group consisted of two subgroups. One subgroup underwent HF-LA TENS, and the second subgroup underwent LF-HA TENS. Despite the greatest analgesic effect observed from HF-LA TENS, which was assessed using scoring methods, during and after treatment, the reduction in the area of pain and paraesthesia symptoms and the area of hypoesthesia was moderate, short-term, and reversible. In contrast, LF-HA TENS had a pronounced analgesic and sustained anti-paraesthesia effect, manifested by a noticeable decrease in pain and paraesthesia symptoms area in PD, gradually increasing during the first 2 months of follow-up and accompanied by an irreversible prolonged decrease in the area of hypoesthesia. The areas of paraesthesia and hypoesthesia correlate with affective reactions to long-term chronic pain, which noticeably regress under the influence of LF-HA TENS compared to HF-LA TENS.
迄今为止,尚未有关于在使用各种经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗感觉异常性股痛后疼痛、感觉异常和感觉减退区域动态变化的研究。在这项初步研究中,我们观察了68例与肥胖相关的双侧感觉异常性股痛患者。使用10分制对疼痛综合征、感觉异常症状和感觉减退进行评估。此外,采用疼痛图(PD)来确定疼痛综合征和感觉异常症状的空间分布区域,采用身体图来确定感觉减退区域。对照组进行假经皮电刺激神经疗法(Sham TENS),治疗组进行有效经皮电刺激神经疗法。治疗组由两个亚组组成。一个亚组接受高频-低幅经皮电刺激神经疗法(HF-LA TENS),第二个亚组接受低频-高幅经皮电刺激神经疗法(LF-HA TENS)。尽管通过评分方法评估发现HF-LA TENS在治疗期间和治疗后具有最大的镇痛效果,但疼痛和感觉异常症状区域以及感觉减退区域的缩小是中度、短期且可逆的。相比之下,LF-HA TENS具有显著的镇痛和持续的抗感觉异常作用,表现为PD中疼痛和感觉异常症状区域明显减小,在随访的前2个月逐渐增加,并伴有感觉减退区域不可逆转的长期减小。感觉异常和感觉减退区域与对长期慢性疼痛的情感反应相关,与HF-LA TENS相比,在LF-HA TENS的影响下,这些情感反应明显消退。