• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动静脉内瘘狭窄的经济高效日间手术:血液透析患者的可行模式

Cost-Effective Day Surgery for Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: A Viable Model for Hemodialysis Patients.

作者信息

Zeng Yi, Wen Jing, Zhan Shen, Hao Xuyang, Wang Yuzhu, Zhang Lihong

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Beijing Haidian Hospital (Haidian Section of Peking University Third Hospital), Beijing, China.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 25;31:e946128. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946128.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.946128
PMID:39861934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11776341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND For patients with end-stage renal disease, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are often used for hemodialysis, but stenosis can impair their function. Traditional inpatient procedures to address AVF stenosis are effective but resource-intensive, prompting the need for alternative approaches like day surgery to optimize care and reduce costs. This study evaluated the feasibility of a day surgery model for AVF stenosis treatment in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, aiming to develop a cost-effective and high-quality care model. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted with 186 MHD patients undergoing AVF stenosis intervention between July 2022 and May, 2023. Patients were divided into a day surgery group (n=112) and a ward group (n=74). Various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were recorded, including AVF patency, complications, and rehospitalization rates. Follow-up assessments were conducted on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 30, with long-term patency evaluated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The day surgery group achieved a technical success rate of 99.11% and a complication rate of 3.57%, compared to 97.30% and 1.35% in the ward group. The day surgery group also had significantly shorter waiting times for beds, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospitalization costs (P<0.01). No significant differences were found between the groups in preoperative or postoperative parameters. CONCLUSIONS The day surgery model for AVF stenosis intervention in MHD patients is a viable option, showing comparable success and complication rates to inpatient surgery while significantly reducing hospital stays and costs.

摘要

背景 对于终末期肾病患者,动静脉内瘘(AVF)常用于血液透析,但狭窄会损害其功能。处理AVF狭窄的传统住院手术虽有效但资源消耗大,因此需要日间手术等替代方法来优化护理并降低成本。本研究评估了在维持性血液透析(MHD)患者中采用日间手术模式治疗AVF狭窄的可行性,旨在建立一种具有成本效益且高质量的护理模式。

材料与方法 对2022年7月至2023年5月期间接受AVF狭窄干预的186例MHD患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。患者被分为日间手术组(n = 112)和病房组(n = 74)。记录了各种术前、术中和术后参数,包括AVF通畅情况、并发症和再住院率。在术后第1、3、7和30天进行随访评估,并在6个月和12个月时评估长期通畅情况。

结果 日间手术组的技术成功率为99.11%,并发症发生率为3.57%,而病房组分别为97.30%和1.35%。日间手术组的床位等待时间也显著缩短,住院时间更短,住院费用更低(P < 0.01)。两组在术前或术后参数方面未发现显著差异。

结论 在MHD患者中采用日间手术模式干预AVF狭窄是一种可行的选择,其成功率和并发症发生率与住院手术相当,同时显著缩短了住院时间并降低了成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e730/11776341/e5298545b6c0/medscimonit-31-e946128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e730/11776341/e5298545b6c0/medscimonit-31-e946128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e730/11776341/e5298545b6c0/medscimonit-31-e946128-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effective Day Surgery for Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: A Viable Model for Hemodialysis Patients.动静脉内瘘狭窄的经济高效日间手术:血液透析患者的可行模式
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 25;31:e946128. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946128.
2
Comparison of Ellipsys Percutaneous and Proximal Forearm Gracz-Type Surgical Arteriovenous Fistulas.Ellipsys经皮与前臂近端Gracz型手术动静脉内瘘的比较
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Oct;78(4):520-529.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Analyses of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula geometric configuration and its associations with maturation and reintervention.分析血液透析动静脉瘘的几何形态及其与成熟和再干预的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1778-1786.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.033. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Relationships Between Clinical Processes and Arteriovenous Fistula Cannulation and Maturation: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.临床操作与动静脉瘘管置管和成熟的关系:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 May;71(5):677-689. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.027. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Medicare Costs Associated With Arteriovenous Fistulas Among US Hemodialysis Patients.美国血液透析患者动静脉瘘相关的医疗保险费用。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jul;72(1):10-18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Costs Attributable to Arteriovenous Fistula and Arteriovenous Graft Placements in Hemodialysis Patients with Medicare coverage.医疗保险覆盖的血液透析患者动静脉瘘和动静脉移植物置管所导致的成本。
Am J Nephrol. 2019;50(4):320-328. doi: 10.1159/000502507. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
7
Arteriovenous fistula formation with adjuvant endovascular maturation.动静脉瘘形成伴辅助血管腔内成熟。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):641-650.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.072. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
8
Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Rising Costs as a Surrogate Marker for Patency and Function of Arteriovenous Fistulas.血液透析血管通路:费用上升作为动静脉内瘘通畅性和功能的替代指标
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
9
Cost-effectiveness of repeated interventions on failing arteriovenous fistulas.重复干预失败动静脉瘘的成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;70(5):1620-1628. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.085. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Two-Year Outcomes of Early Cannulation Arteriovenous Grafts for End-Stage Renal Disease.终末期肾病早期动静脉内瘘成形术的两年随访结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Preoperative Risk Factors on Unplanned Readmission After Day Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.日间手术术前风险因素对非计划再入院的影响:一项荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):281. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070281.

本文引用的文献

1
Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation, Functional Patency, and Intervention Rates.动静脉瘘成熟度、功能通畅率和介入治疗率。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1111-1118. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4527.
2
A UK Expert Consensus Approach for Managing Symptomatic Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients.英国专家共识:血液透析患者症状性动静脉瘘(AVF)狭窄的管理方法
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1736-1746. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02875-5. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Evaluation of the safety of arteriovenous fistula creation surgery in ambulatory versus inpatient hospital setting.
门诊与住院环境下动静脉内瘘创建手术安全性的评估。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):1295-1299. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.275473.
4
US Renal Data System 2019 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.美国肾脏数据系统2019年年报:美国肾脏疾病流行病学
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jan;75(1 Suppl 1):A6-A7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
In-hospital outcome of peripheral vascular intervention in dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients.透析依赖的终末期肾病患者外周血管介入治疗的住院转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):E84-E95. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28522. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Economic Impact of Starting Hemodialysis with a Catheter after Predialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Creation.经皮血管造瘘术后立即使用导管开始血液透析的临床转归和经济影响。
Am J Nephrol. 2019;50(3):221-227. doi: 10.1159/000502050. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
7
Innovations in vascular access for hemodialysis.血液透析血管通路的创新。
Kidney Int. 2019 May;95(5):1053-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.11.046. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
8
Medicare Costs Associated With Arteriovenous Fistulas Among US Hemodialysis Patients.美国血液透析患者动静脉瘘相关的医疗保险费用。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jul;72(1):10-18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Temporal Trends, Determinants, and Outcomes of Inpatient versus Outpatient Arteriovenous Fistula Operations.住院与门诊动静脉内瘘手术的时间趋势、决定因素及结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:65-74.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.032. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
The Clinical and Economic Effect of Vascular Access Selection in Patients Initiating Hemodialysis with a Catheter.导管置入开始血液透析患者血管通路选择的临床及经济效果
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Dec;28(12):3679-3687. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016060707. Epub 2017 Jul 14.