Suppr超能文献

替戈拉赞与质子泵抑制剂用于一线根除治疗的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Comparison of tegoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for first-line eradication: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cho Jun-Hyung, Jin So-Young, Park Suyeon

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Pathology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2025 Feb-Apr;23(2-4):227-233. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2025.2459722. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker with potent gastric acid-suppressing activity, may be a potential agent for treating infection. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TPZ-based therapy for eradication compared with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to investigate the beneficial effects of TPZ-based therapy for eradication. Studies that evaluated the eradication rates between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies were included. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to calculate the eradication rate and pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 3200 patients were included. eradication rates did not differ significantly between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies based on the intention-to-treat (77.3% vs. 76.4%,  = 0.68; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.97-1.05]) and per-protocol (84.3% vs. 84.2%,  = 0.69; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.98-1.04]) analyses. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the adverse drug events between TPZ- and PPI-based therapies (27.2% vs. 30.8%,  = 0.26; pooled RR = 0.91 [0.76-1.08]).

CONCLUSIONS

eradication and adverse drug event rates with TPZ- and PPI-based treatments were similar.

摘要

背景

替戈拉赞(TPZ)是一种具有强大胃酸抑制活性的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,可能是治疗感染的潜在药物。本研究旨在评估与基于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的疗法相比,基于TPZ的疗法根除[某种感染]的疗效。

研究设计与方法

截至2024年8月,使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索,以研究基于TPZ的疗法根除[某种感染]的有益效果。纳入评估基于TPZ的疗法和基于PPI的疗法之间根除率的研究。作者进行了荟萃分析,以计算根除率和合并风险比(RR)及95%置信区间。

结果

纳入了7项涉及3200例患者的研究。基于意向性分析(77.3%对76.4%,P = 0.68;合并RR = 1.01 [0.97 - 1.05])和符合方案分析(84.3%对84.2%,P = 0.69;合并RR = 1.01 [0.98 - 1.04]),基于TPZ的疗法和基于PPI的疗法之间的根除率无显著差异。此外,基于TPZ的疗法和基于PPI的疗法之间在药物不良事件方面未观察到显著差异(27.2%对30.8%,P = 0.26;合并RR = 0.91 [0.76 - 1.08])。

结论

基于TPZ的治疗和基于PPI的治疗在根除[某种感染]及药物不良事件发生率方面相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验