• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊全髋关节置换术:机器人辅助可减少术后90天的事件并优化门诊护理。

Outpatient total hip arthroplasty: robotic assistance reduces 90-Day postoperative events and optimizes outpatient care.

作者信息

Kouyoumdjian Pascal, Brichni Malek, Marchand Philippe, Coulomb Rémy

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.

Laboratoire de Génie Civil et Génie Mécanique, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 25;145(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05767-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05767-2
PMID:39862256
Abstract

PURPOSE

The adoption of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly widespread, yet its influence on outcomes in outpatient surgery remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether robotic assistance reduces the rate of 90-day postoperative events in patients undergoing outpatient THA, compared to those in inpatient procedures.

METHODS

This historical-prospective cohort study analyzed 706 primary THA cases performed between January 2017 and January 2023 by three senior surgeons. Patients were grouped into outpatient (n = 132) and inpatient (n = 576) cohorts. From December 2019, robotic-assisted THA using the MAKO™ system was implemented. Propensity score matching was used to minimize baseline differences between groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any event within 90 days post-surgery, including readmissions, reoperations, and other complications. Secondary outcomes included functional scores, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative factors such as blood loss and Operative Room (OR) time.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between inpatient and outpatient groups in terms of gender, age, BMI, ASA score, or surgeon. The 90-day event rates were similar between the two groups (8.59% vs. 9.38%, p > 0.999). However, outpatient THA was associated with lower blood loss (p = 0.02) and shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified prolonged OR time (> 2 h), BMI ≥ 25, and manual surgical techniques as significant risk factors for 90-day events. Robotic-assisted surgery, although not statistically significant (p = 0.105), showed a trend towards reducing complications in outpatient THA.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient THA is a safe alternative to inpatient surgery, with no significant difference in 90-day postoperative events. Robotic-assisted surgery appears to reduce complications, particularly in the outpatient setting, and may optimize outpatient care pathways. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)的应用日益广泛,但其对门诊手术结果的影响仍不确定。本研究旨在评估与住院手术相比,机器人辅助是否能降低门诊THA患者术后90天内事件的发生率。

方法

这项历史前瞻性队列研究分析了2017年1月至2023年1月期间由三位资深外科医生进行的706例初次THA病例。患者被分为门诊(n = 132)和住院(n = 576)队列。从2019年12月起,开始实施使用MAKO™系统的机器人辅助THA。采用倾向评分匹配法以尽量减少组间基线差异。主要结局是术后90天内发生的任何事件,包括再次入院、再次手术和其他并发症。次要结局包括功能评分、住院时间以及术中因素如失血和手术室(OR)时间。

结果

住院组和门诊组在性别、年龄、BMI、ASA评分或外科医生方面未发现显著差异。两组的90天事件发生率相似(8.59%对9.38%,p > 0.999)。然而,门诊THA的失血量较少(p = 0.02),住院时间较短(p < 0.001)。多变量分析确定手术时间延长(> 2小时)、BMI≥25和手动手术技术是90天事件的重要危险因素。机器人辅助手术虽然无统计学意义(p = 0.105),但在门诊THA中显示出降低并发症的趋势。

结论

门诊THA是住院手术的一种安全替代方案,术后90天事件无显著差异。机器人辅助手术似乎能降低并发症,尤其是在门诊环境中,并且可能优化门诊护理路径。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现并探索长期结局。

证据水平

III级

相似文献

1
Outpatient total hip arthroplasty: robotic assistance reduces 90-Day postoperative events and optimizes outpatient care.门诊全髋关节置换术:机器人辅助可减少术后90天的事件并优化门诊护理。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 25;145(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05767-2.
2
Readmission Within 90 Days After Primary THA Is Associated With Decreased Improvement in 1-Year Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Increased Reoperation Rates.初次全髋关节置换术后90天内再次入院与患者报告的1年结局指标改善降低及再次手术率增加相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429.
3
Outpatient Revision TKA Does Not Increase Incidence of Repeat Revision or Medical and Surgical Complications Compared With Inpatient Revision TKA.与住院全膝关节置换翻修术相比,门诊全膝关节置换翻修术不会增加再次翻修的发生率或内科及外科并发症的发生率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1302-7. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003386.
4
Is a Rapid Recovery Protocol for THA and TKA Associated With Decreased 90-day Complications, Opioid Use, and Readmissions in a Health Safety-net Hospital?THA 和 TKA 的快速康复方案是否与降低卫生保障医院 90 天内并发症、阿片类药物使用和再入院率有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1442-1451. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003054. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
Robotic Assistance Is Not Associated With Decreased Early Revisions in Cementless TKA: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry.机器人辅助与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术早期翻修率降低无关:来自美国关节置换登记处的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):431-438. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003330. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
6
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?间隔超过1年的对侧全髋关节置换术:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗资源利用情况是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
7
Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.关节置换外科医生的修正率与术后患者报告的结果测量评分相关吗?来自澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):98-112. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002737. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
Low rates of dislocation and reoperation following robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折后脱位和再次手术发生率低。
Hip Int. 2025 Jul;35(4):402-409. doi: 10.1177/11207000241312385. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
9
Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates in Robotic-Assisted and Manual Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Large, Multi-Hospital Study.机器人辅助与人工全髋关节置换术的术后并发症及再入院率:一项大型多医院研究
Med Care. 2025 Jul 1;63(7):465-471. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002082. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
10
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty: economic impact and workflow efficiency.机器人辅助全髋关节和膝关节置换术:经济影响和工作流程效率。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 8;19(1):578. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02698-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid Use After Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A National Database Analysis.机器人辅助与传统全髋关节置换术后阿片类药物使用:国家数据库分析。
Orthopedics. 2024 Sep-Oct;47(5):289-294. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20240702-03. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Pair-Matched Controlled Study.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术的短期临床疗效:一项配对对照研究。
Orthopedics. 2021 Mar-Apr;44(2):e236-e242. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20201119-10. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.
机器人辅助髋臼杯定位在全髋关节置换术中的学习曲线。
Hip Int. 2021 May;31(3):311-319. doi: 10.1177/1120700019889334. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
4
The learning curve associated with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.与机器人辅助全髋关节置换术相关的学习曲线。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 8.