• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脐单孔袖状胃切除术的结果与挑战:基于身高和体重指数的回顾性分析

Outcomes and Challenges of Transumbilical Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on Height and BMI.

作者信息

Widjaja Jason, Meng Xiangzhi, Sun Hongru, Lin Hongwei

机构信息

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Plastic Surgery Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):837-842. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07638-y. Epub 2025 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07638-y
PMID:39862377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11906489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) is a minimally invasive bariatric surgery that offers cosmetic benefits. However, the procedure's feasibility in patients with higher BMI or taller stature remains debated. This study evaluates the outcomes of SPSG based on patient height and BMI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 753 patients who underwent stand-alone SPSG at our hospital between January 2021 and August 2024. Patients' preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. We compared operative times, complication rates, and postoperative length of stay between patients with different height and BMI categories.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was significantly longer for patients with a height ≥ 1.8 m (77.5 ± 32.5 min) compared to those < 1.8 m (63.1 ± 26.0 min) (p < 0.05). Similarly, patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m had a longer operative time (79.2 ± 32.0 min) than those with a BMI < 50 kg/m (62.9 ± 25.9 min) (p < 0.005). No significant difference was observed in the postoperative complications rate and length of stay between the height and BMI groups. The mean 1 year percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was 31.1 ± 7.1%.

CONCLUSION

SPSG is a feasible procedure for patients with varying heights and BMIs, though it may require longer operative times for certain groups. The procedure's success hinges on the surgeon's expertise and a thorough understanding of patient anatomy. Further research is necessary to optimize single-port techniques and assess long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

经脐单孔袖状胃切除术(SPSG)是一种具有美容优势的微创减肥手术。然而,该手术在BMI较高或身材较高的患者中的可行性仍存在争议。本研究基于患者身高和BMI评估SPSG的手术效果。

方法

我们对2021年1月至2024年8月期间在我院接受单纯SPSG手术的753例患者进行了回顾性分析。收集患者的术前特征、术中数据和术后结果。我们比较了不同身高和BMI类别的患者之间的手术时间、并发症发生率和术后住院时间。

结果

身高≥1.8 m的患者平均手术时间(77.5±32.5分钟)明显长于身高<1.8 m的患者(63.1±26.0分钟)(p<0.05)。同样,BMI≥50 kg/m²的患者手术时间(79.2±32.0分钟)比BMI<50 kg/m²的患者(62.9±25.9分钟)长(p<0.005)。身高和BMI组之间的术后并发症发生率和住院时间没有显著差异。平均1年总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)为31.1±7.1%。

结论

SPSG对于不同身高和BMI的患者是一种可行的手术,尽管某些组可能需要更长的手术时间。该手术的成功取决于外科医生的专业知识和对患者解剖结构的透彻了解。有必要进行进一步研究以优化单孔技术并评估长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bec/11906489/f41c45550803/11695_2024_7638_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bec/11906489/07117f60a76e/11695_2024_7638_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bec/11906489/f41c45550803/11695_2024_7638_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bec/11906489/07117f60a76e/11695_2024_7638_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bec/11906489/f41c45550803/11695_2024_7638_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes and Challenges of Transumbilical Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on Height and BMI.经脐单孔袖状胃切除术的结果与挑战:基于身高和体重指数的回顾性分析
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):837-842. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07638-y. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
Routine gastric suspension technique in single-port sleeve gastrectomy procedure.单孔套管胃切除术的常规胃悬吊技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9651-9657. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10502-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
3
Short-term outcomes of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3978-3985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07175-1. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
4
Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study.经脐单孔套管胃切除术:初步经验和对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1247-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2002-9. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
5
Single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a comparison between transumbilical and left hypochondrium approaches.单孔袖状胃切除术:经脐入路与左季肋部入路的比较
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2221-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11529-3. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
6
Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为1000例患者的常规手术
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Aug;12(7):1270-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Single port sleeve gastrectomy: strategic use of technology to re-establish fundamental tenets of multiport laparoscopy.单孔套管胃切除术:技术的巧妙运用使多孔腹腔镜技术重新回到基本原则。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
8
Single-port sleeve gastrectomy for super-obese patients.针对超级肥胖患者的单孔袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Mar-Apr;12(3):522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
9
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为主要减肥手术的长期疗效。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
10
Routine single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a study of 60 consecutive patients.常规单孔袖状胃切除术:连续 60 例患者的研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.01.023. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Across the IFSO Chapters: Key Insights on the Baseline Patient Demographics, Procedure Types, and Mortality from the Eighth IFSO Global Registry Report.IFSO 各章节的代谢减重手术:第八届 IFSO 全球注册研究报告中基线患者人口统计学特征、手术类型和死亡率的关键见解。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1764-1777. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07196-3. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2
Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.单切口与传统多端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46956. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Routine gastric suspension technique in single-port sleeve gastrectomy procedure.
单孔套管胃切除术的常规胃悬吊技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9651-9657. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10502-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Bleeding and Leakage Rates in Four Staple-Line Reinforcement Methods: A Prospective Observational Study.四种缝钉线加固方法对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术出血和漏的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Nov;32(11):1176-1180. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0122. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Severe Obesity: Review and Perspectives.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗重度肥胖症:综述与展望。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2781-2790. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04620-2.
6
Short-term outcomes of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3978-3985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07175-1. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
7
Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Bariatric Surgery: A Review of Single-Port Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Bariatric Treatments.腹腔镜单孔减重手术:单孔腹腔镜及内镜减重治疗综述
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2018 Mar 30;27(1):25-34. doi: 10.7570/jomes.2018.27.1.25.
8
Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis.单孔袖状胃切除术与三孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的回顾性比较:倾向评分调整分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3244-6.
9
Weight-loss outcomes of SPIDER(®) sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months compared to traditional laparoscopic technique.与传统腹腔镜技术相比,SPIDER(®)袖状胃切除术6个月时的减重效果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2043-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4451-z. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
10
Single Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Review.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:综述
Obes Surg. 2015 Aug;25(8):1502-10. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1709-4.