Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Department of Surgery, Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, 31100, Treviso, Italy.
Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3244-6.
Evaluate the efficacy of single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) and then compare it to a less-invasive sleeve approach (three-port) (3PSG) according to a propensity score (PS) matching analysis.
We analyzed all patients who underwent SG through a three-port or a single-port laparoscopic approach.
After 2 years, the follow-up was completed in 84% patients treated with 3PSG and 95% patients of the SPSG group. Excess weight loss (EWL) was comparable for the first year of follow-up within the two groups except for the controls at 3 months in which the SPSG group showed a higher EWL (p = 0.0243).
We demonstrated the efficacy of SPSG in bariatric surgery even compared to another, less invasive, laparoscopic SG approach (three-port).
评估单孔袖状胃切除术（SPSG）的疗效，然后根据倾向评分（PS）匹配分析将其与微创袖状胃切除术（三孔）（3PSG）进行比较。
我们分析了所有通过三孔或单孔腹腔镜方法进行 SG 的患者。
2 年后，3PSG 组 84%的患者和 SPSG 组 95%的患者完成了随访。除了对照组在 3 个月时 SPSG 组显示出更高的 EWL（p = 0.0243）外，两组在前一年的随访中，超重减轻（EWL）是可比的。
我们证明了 SPSG 在减重手术中的疗效，即使与另一种微创腹腔镜 SG 方法（三孔）相比也是如此。
