Gélinas Janik, Claing Aurélie, Dugal Caroline, Savard Claudia, Daspe Marie-Ève, Péloquin Katherine, Godbout Natacha, Brassard Audrey
Département de psychologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada.
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Child Abuse Negl. 2025 Mar;161:107258. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107258. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
Childhood Interpersonal Trauma (CIT) is a major public health issue that increases the risk of perpetrating and sustaining intimate partner violence (IPV) in adulthood, perpetuating intergenerational cycles of violence. Yet, the explanatory mechanisms behind the intergenerational transmission of trauma warrant further exploration.
This study explored identity diffusion as an explanatory mechanism linking cumulative and individual CIT (sexual, physical and psychological abuse, physical and psychological neglect, witnessing parental physical or psychological IPV, bullying) to IPV (sexual, physical, psychological, coercive control) and to the next generation's exposure to family violence. Gender differences (men, women, gender diversity) in these links were examined.
A sample of 846 adults (60.4 % men, 36.4 % women, 3.2 % gender diverse) entering therapy across 21 community IPV specialized organizations were recruited.
Participants completed brief validated questionnaires assessing CIT, identity diffusion, IPV perpetration and victimization, and new generation's exposure to family violence.
Four path analysis models showed that cumulative CIT, psychological neglect, and bullying were indirectly associated with adult IPV perpetration and victimization, and new generation family violence exposure through higher identity diffusion (βs ranging 0.037-0.091). Cumulative CIT was not related to IPV perpetration for gender diverse individuals, nor was identity diffusion related to IPV victimization for this group.
This study highlights the relevance of trauma-sensitive and identity-focused interventions that consider familial history and gender identity to effectively address the intergenerational transmission of trauma.
童年人际创伤(CIT)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,它会增加成年后实施和遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的风险,使暴力的代际循环持续存在。然而,创伤代际传递背后的解释机制仍有待进一步探索。
本研究探讨身份认同扩散作为一种解释机制,将累积性和个体性的童年人际创伤(性虐待、身体虐待和心理虐待、身体和心理忽视、目睹父母身体或心理上的亲密伴侣暴力、欺凌)与亲密伴侣暴力(性暴力、身体暴力、心理暴力、强制控制)以及下一代遭受家庭暴力联系起来。研究还考察了这些联系中的性别差异(男性、女性、性别多元化)。
招募了846名成年人(60.4%为男性,36.4%为女性,3.2%为性别多元化者)作为样本,他们来自21个社区亲密伴侣暴力专门组织,正在接受治疗。
参与者完成了经过验证的简短问卷,评估童年人际创伤、身份认同扩散、亲密伴侣暴力的实施和受害情况,以及下一代遭受家庭暴力的情况。
四个路径分析模型表明,累积性童年人际创伤、心理忽视和欺凌与成年后亲密伴侣暴力的实施和受害情况以及下一代遭受家庭暴力存在间接关联,这种关联是通过更高的身份认同扩散实现的(β值范围为0.037 - 0.091)。对于性别多元化个体,累积性童年人际创伤与亲密伴侣暴力的实施无关,身份认同扩散与该群体亲密伴侣暴力的受害情况也无关。
本研究强调了考虑家族史和性别认同的创伤敏感型和以身份认同为重点的干预措施对于有效解决创伤代际传递问题的相关性。