Mousad Albert D, Beleckas Casey M, Lack Benjamin, Schodlbauer Daniel F, Levy Jonathan C
Levy Shoulder to Hand Center at the Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Florida Atlantic University Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.014.
There has been an increase in both primary anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) over the last decade, with rates peaking for patients aged 75 years and older. Despite aTSA being the mainstay of treatment for patients with glenohumeral arthritis in the absence of rotator cuff insufficiency, there has been an upward trend of rTSA utilization in the elderly due to concerns about rotator cuff integrity, regardless of deformity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes including pain, function, range of motion, satisfaction, and complications in patients 80 years or older following primary aTSA and rTSA for osteoarthritis without full thickness rotator cuff tears.
A retrospective query of our institution's shoulder and elbow surgery repository identified patients treated with aTSA or rTSA between November 2006 and February 2022. Patients ≥80 year old with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent surgery for a primary indication of osteoarthritis without a full thickness rotator cuff tear were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Visual Analog Score Function, and Visual Analog Score Pain scores), range of motion, and strength were evaluated at the visit immediately before surgery and at most recent follow-up. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated at most recent follow-up. Complications and revisions were reported.
A total of 130 patients (77 aTSA and 53 rTSA) met inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in demographics between cohorts. At most recent follow-up, there were no significant differences in PROMs between cohorts. aTSA patients achieved greater postoperative motion in external rotation (50° vs. 40°; P = .003) and internal rotation (8 vs. 5; P = .001), with no difference in forward elevation. There were 6 complications amongst aTSA patients (7.8%): 4 with subscapularis insufficiency, one humeral shaft periprosthetic fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation, and one with prosthetic joint infection revised to a functional composite spacer. Three rTSA patients (5.6%) sustained complications - all acromion/scapular spine fractures (2 type 2; 1 type 3) which were treated nonoperatively. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications or revisions between groups.
Both aTSA and rTSA for osteoarthritis yield similarly high patient satisfaction, good functional outcomes, and low complication rates in patients over the age of 80 years.
在过去十年中,初次解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)和反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的手术量均有所增加,75岁及以上患者的手术率达到峰值。尽管在不存在肩袖功能不全的情况下,aTSA是治疗盂肱关节炎患者的主要方法,但由于对肩袖完整性的担忧,无论是否存在畸形,rTSA在老年患者中的应用呈上升趋势。本研究的目的是评估80岁及以上患者在接受初次aTSA和rTSA治疗骨关节炎且无全层肩袖撕裂后的疼痛、功能、活动范围、满意度和并发症等结果。
对本机构的肩肘外科资料库进行回顾性查询,确定2006年11月至2022年2月期间接受aTSA或rTSA治疗的患者。纳入年龄≥80岁、至少随访2年、因骨关节炎初次手术且无全层肩袖撕裂的患者。在手术前即刻和最近一次随访时评估患者报告的结局指标(PROMs;美国肩肘外科医师协会、简易肩关节测试、单项评估数字评分、视觉模拟评分功能和视觉模拟评分疼痛评分)、活动范围和力量。在最近一次随访时还评估了患者满意度。报告并发症和翻修情况。
共有130例患者(77例aTSA和53例rTSA)符合纳入标准。两组患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异。在最近一次随访时,两组患者的PROMs无显著差异。aTSA患者术后外旋活动度(50°对40°;P = 0.003)和内旋活动度(8对5;P = 0.001)更大,前屈活动度无差异。aTSA患者中有6例发生并发症(7.8%):4例肩胛下肌功能不全,1例肱骨干假体周围骨折行切开复位内固定治疗,1例人工关节感染翻修为功能性复合间隔物。3例rTSA患者(5.6%)发生并发症——均为肩峰/肩胛冈骨折(2例2型;1例3型),均采用非手术治疗。两组之间的并发症或翻修率无显著差异。
对于80岁以上的患者,aTSA和rTSA治疗骨关节炎均能产生相似的高患者满意度、良好的功能结局和低并发症发生率。