McHale Philip, Fahy Katie, Pennington Andy, Schlüter Daniela K, Barr Ben, Taylor-Robinson David
Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e084147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084147.
How are socioeconomic inequalities modified by, or how do they interact with, preterm birth?
Narrative systematic review of quantitative observational studies of an interaction, or effect modification, between preterm birth and socioeconomic status.
Five databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and June 2020. Title and abstract were reviewed to identify articles for dual screening. All included studies were citation searched.
Inclusion criteria were comparison across socioeconomic status and gestational age, interaction between the two, or stratification by either, and health or education as outcome.
Data extracted included study design, sample size, outcome, interaction measure, effect and significance. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality and synthesised narratively.
After searches, 52 studies were identified for full-text screening and, with supplementary citation searches, we identified 21 included studies. Eighteen studies studied interaction between gestational age or preterm birth, and socioeconomic status. Three groups of outcomes were identified: cognitive, mental health and developmental. Age at outcome measurement was divided into four categories: preschool, primary school (5-11), secondary school (11-18) and post school (18-29). Seven studies found a significant interaction between the effect of preterm birth and socioeconomic status. Six of these interactions demonstrate that the negative influence of low socioeconomic status was stronger for those born preterm (and vice versa) for cognitive and mental health outcomes, all in studies with a sample size of more than 100 000. One study found that negative effects of low socioeconomic status were reduced for those born preterm (and vice versa) for communication delay.
Our findings suggest that the impact of low socioeconomic status on cognitive and mental health outcomes is exacerbated by preterm birth. The remaining evidence suggests the effects are not modified; however, this is potentially due to underpowered studies. Public health action is indicated to support babies born preterm, particularly for disadvantaged families, to improve educational attainment and mental health.
CRD42020203613.
社会经济不平等是如何被早产改变的,或者它们与早产是如何相互作用的?
对早产与社会经济地位之间相互作用或效应修正的定量观察性研究进行叙述性系统评价。
检索了五个数据库,查找2000年1月至2020年6月期间发表的研究。对标题和摘要进行了审查,以确定用于双重筛选的文章。对所有纳入研究进行了文献追溯。
纳入标准为跨社会经济地位和胎龄进行比较、两者之间的相互作用、或按其中任何一项进行分层,以及以健康或教育作为结局。
提取的数据包括研究设计、样本量、结局、相互作用测量、效应和显著性。对纳入研究进行方法学质量评估并进行叙述性综合。
检索后,确定了52项研究进行全文筛选,通过补充文献追溯,我们确定了21项纳入研究。18项研究探讨了胎龄或早产与社会经济地位之间的相互作用。确定了三组结局:认知、心理健康和发育。结局测量时的年龄分为四类:学龄前、小学(5 - 11岁)、中学(11 - 18岁)和中学后(18 - 29岁)。七项研究发现早产效应与社会经济地位之间存在显著相互作用。其中六项相互作用表明,对于认知和心理健康结局,社会经济地位低对早产出生者的负面影响更强(反之亦然),所有这些研究的样本量均超过100000。一项研究发现,对于沟通延迟,社会经济地位低对早产出生者的负面影响有所降低(反之亦然)。
我们的研究结果表明,早产会加剧社会经济地位低对认知和心理健康结局的影响。其余证据表明效应未被改变;然而,这可能是由于研究效能不足。建议采取公共卫生行动来支持早产出生的婴儿,特别是对于处境不利的家庭,以提高教育水平和心理健康。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020203613。