• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用移动数字干预进行手术部位感染的远程诊断:一项针对急诊手术患者的随机对照试验。

Remote diagnosis of surgical-site infection using a mobile digital intervention: a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients.

作者信息

McLean Kenneth A, Mountain Katie E, Shaw Catherine A, Drake Thomas M, Pius Riinu, Knight Stephen R, Fairfield Cameron J, Sgrò Alessandro, Bouamrane Matt, Cambridge William A, Lyons Mathew, Riad Aya, Skipworth Richard J E, Wigmore Stephen J, Potter Mark A, Harrison Ewen M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK.

Centre for Medical Informatics (CMI), Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, 9 Little France Rd, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 18;4(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00526-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-021-00526-0
PMID:34795398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8602321/
Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) cause substantial morbidity and pose a burden to acute healthcare services after surgery. We aimed to investigate whether a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool can expedite diagnosis and treatment of SSI after emergency abdominal surgery. This single-blinded randomised control trial (NCT02704897) enroled adult emergency abdominal surgery patients in two tertiary care hospitals. Patients were randomised (1:1) to routine postoperative care or additional access to a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patient-reported SSI symptoms and wound photographs were requested on postoperative days 3, 7, and 15. The primary outcome was time-to-diagnosis of SSI (Centers for Disease Control definition). 492 patients were randomised (smartphone intervention: 223; routine care: 269). There was no significant difference in the 30-day SSI rate between trial arms: 21 (9.4%) in smartphone vs 20 (7.4%, p = 0.513) in routine care. Among the smartphone group, 32.3% (n = 72) did not utilise the tool. There was no significant difference in time-to-diagnosis of SSI for patients receiving the intervention (-2.5 days, 95% CI: -6.6-1.6, p = 0.225). However, patients in the smartphone group had 3.7-times higher odds of diagnosis within 7 postoperative days (95% CI: 1.02-13.51, p = 0.043). The smartphone group had significantly reduced community care attendance (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.94, p = 0.030), similar hospital attendance (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.28-1.96, p = 0.577), and significantly better experiences in accessing care (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17-3.53, p = 0.013). Smartphone-delivered wound follow-up is feasible following emergency abdominal surgery. This can facilitate triage to the appropriate level of assessment required, allowing earlier postoperative diagnosis of SSI.

摘要

手术部位感染(SSI)会导致严重的发病情况,并给术后的急性医疗服务带来负担。我们旨在研究一款通过智能手机提供的伤口评估工具能否加快急诊腹部手术后SSI的诊断和治疗。这项单盲随机对照试验(NCT02704897)在两家三级护理医院纳入了成年急诊腹部手术患者。患者被随机(1:1)分为接受常规术后护理组或术后30天额外使用一款通过智能手机提供的伤口评估工具的组。在术后第3天、第7天和第15天,要求患者报告SSI症状并上传伤口照片。主要结局是SSI的诊断时间(疾病控制中心的定义)。492名患者被随机分组(智能手机干预组:223名;常规护理组:269名)。试验组之间30天SSI发生率无显著差异:智能手机组为21例(9.4%),常规护理组为20例(7.4%,p = 0.513)。在智能手机组中,32.3%(n = 72)的患者未使用该工具。接受干预的患者在SSI诊断时间上无显著差异(-2.5天,95%置信区间:-6.6 - 1.6,p = 0.225)。然而,智能手机组患者在术后7天内被诊断出的几率高3.7倍(95%置信区间:1.02 - 13.51,p = 0.043)。智能手机组的社区护理就诊率显著降低(比值比:0.57,95%置信区间:0.34 - 0.94,p = 0.030),医院就诊情况相似(比值比:0.76,95%置信区间:0.28 - 1.96,p = 0.577),且在获得护理方面的体验显著更好(比值比:2.02,95%置信区间:1.17 - 3.53,p = 0.013)。急诊腹部手术后通过智能手机进行伤口随访是可行的。这有助于将患者分诊到所需的适当评估级别,从而实现术后SSI的早期诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/d52eb250f5da/41746_2021_526_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/5a49327d07f6/41746_2021_526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/c0436cb2e868/41746_2021_526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/ec10cb3d6864/41746_2021_526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/c49a118b9a03/41746_2021_526_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/d52eb250f5da/41746_2021_526_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/5a49327d07f6/41746_2021_526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/c0436cb2e868/41746_2021_526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/ec10cb3d6864/41746_2021_526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/c49a118b9a03/41746_2021_526_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c5f/8602321/d52eb250f5da/41746_2021_526_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Remote diagnosis of surgical-site infection using a mobile digital intervention: a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients.使用移动数字干预进行手术部位感染的远程诊断:一项针对急诊手术患者的随机对照试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 18;4(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00526-0.
2
Can a smartphone-delivered tool facilitate the assessment of surgical site infection and result in earlier treatment? Tracking wound infection with smartphone technology (TWIST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients.一款通过智能手机提供的工具能否促进手术部位感染的评估并实现更早治疗?利用智能手机技术追踪伤口感染(TWIST):一项针对急诊手术患者的随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 3;9(10):e029620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029620.
3
Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice.常规外科手术中远程数字术后伤口监测的评估
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 May 5;6(1):85. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9.
4
A non-randomised pragmatic trial for the early detection and prevention of surgical wound complications using an advanced hydropolymer wound dressing and smartphone technology: The EDISON trial protocol.一种使用高级水聚合物伤口敷料和智能手机技术早期检测和预防手术伤口并发症的非随机实用临床试验:EDISON 试验方案。
Int Wound J. 2022 Dec;19(8):2174-2182. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13823. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
6
Surgical wound assessment by sonography in the prediction of surgical wound infections.超声检查评估手术伤口对预测手术伤口感染的作用
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):229-36. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000908.
7
Reduction of surgical site infection using a novel intervention (ROSSINI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.使用新型干预措施降低手术部位感染(ROSSINI):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Oct 4;12:217. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-217.
8
[Surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study].中国腹部手术后手术部位感染:一项多中心横断面研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 25;23(11):1036-1042. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200810-00470.
9
[Risk factors for surgical site infection after emergency abdominal surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China].[急诊腹部手术后手术部位感染的危险因素:一项中国多中心横断面研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 25;23(11):1043-1050. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.441530-20200527-00315.
10
[Surgical site infection following abdominal surgery in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study].中国腹部手术后手术部位感染:一项多中心横断面研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;21(12):1366-1373.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative remote first care for financially and environmentally sustainable healthcare.术后远程初级护理以实现经济和环境可持续的医疗保健。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 21;8(1):299. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01585-3.
2
The legal and socioeconomic considerations of spine telemedicine in Canada.加拿大脊柱远程医疗的法律和社会经济考量
J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 24;11(1):166-177. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-72. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
Multicenter Study Protocol: Research on Evaluation and Detection of Surgical Wound Complications with AI-Based Recognition (REDSCAR-Trial).

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Access and Equity in a Post-COVID Era.快速向远程医疗和数字鸿沟过渡:在后 COVID-19 时代对初级保健可及性和公平性的影响。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):340-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12509. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Beyond the tip of the iceberg: direct and indirect effects of COVID-19.冰山一角之外:新冠病毒病的直接和间接影响
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Apr;3(4):e205-e206. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00024-8. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Telemedicine in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Increasing Access to Surgical Care.
多中心研究方案:基于人工智能识别的手术伤口并发症评估与检测研究(REDSCAR试验)。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):2210. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072210.
4
Multimodal machine learning to predict surgical site infection with healthcare workload impact assessment.用于通过医疗保健工作量影响评估预测手术部位感染的多模态机器学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 23;8(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01419-8.
5
Exploratory study of patients' and carers' preferences for postdischarge surgical wound monitoring using survey and interviews.通过调查和访谈对患者及护理人员对出院后手术伤口监测的偏好进行探索性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e087320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087320.
6
Enhancing Surgical Wound Monitoring: A Paired Cohort Study Evaluating a New AI-Based Application for Automatic Detection of Potential Infections.加强手术伤口监测:一项配对队列研究,评估一种基于人工智能的新型自动检测潜在感染的应用程序。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 23;13(24):7863. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247863.
7
Wound imaging software and digital platform to assist review of surgical wounds using patient smartphones: The development and evaluation of artificial intelligence (WISDOM AI study).使用患者智能手机辅助手术伤口评估的伤口成像软件和数字平台:人工智能的开发与评估(WISDOM人工智能研究)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0315384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315384. eCollection 2024.
8
Implementation of digital remote postoperative monitoring in routine practice: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.在常规实践中实施数字远程术后监测:对障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02670-5.
9
Digital wound monitoring with artificial intelligence to prioritise surgical wounds in cardiac surgery patients for priority or standard review: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial (WISDOM).人工智能数字化伤口监测对心脏手术患者的手术伤口进行优先或标准评估的优先级排序:一项随机可行性试验(WISDOM)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):e086486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086486.
10
Accuracy of the Wound Healing Questionnaire in the diagnosis of surgical-site infection after abdominal surgery in low- and middle-income countries.《伤口愈合问卷》在中低收入国家腹部手术后手术部位感染诊断中的准确性。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad446.
COVID-19大流行后的远程医疗:增加手术护理的可及性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Dec 15;9(1):e3228. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003228. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Assessing Telemedicine Unreadiness Among Older Adults in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间美国老年人的远程医疗准备情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1389-1391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2671.
5
Implementation of surgical site infection surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A position statement for the International Society for Infectious Diseases.中低收入国家手术部位感染监测的实施:国际传染病学会立场声明。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
6
Telemedicine for Surgical Consultations - Pandemic Response or Here to Stay?: A Report of Public Perceptions.远程外科会诊——大流行应对手段还是长久之计?:公众认知的报告。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):e174-e180. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004125.
7
Perspective on COVID-19: Finally, Telemedicine at Center Stage.对 COVID-19 的看法:终于,远程医疗成为焦点。
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Sep;26(9):1106-1109. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0132. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的虚拟医疗保健
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1180-1181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30818-7.
9
Re-examining causes of surgical site infections following elective surgery in the era of asepsis.重新审视无菌时代择期手术后手术部位感染的原因。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):e38-e43. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30756-X. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
10
Enhanced postoperative recovery: good from afar, but far from good?术后恢复加速:远水解不了近渴?
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e54-e61. doi: 10.1111/anae.14860.