Wang Zhiqiang, Yang Yi, Ge Chunlei, Tian Rui, Cheng Sheng, Gao Jingyu, Wang Yan, Yue Qi, Wang Zhiwei, He Qingqing, Xu Yuchuan, Li Yan, Feng Xudong, Yang Yanli, Zhang Yong
Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 295 Xichang Road, Kunming, 650032, P. R. China.
Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Baoshan City, Intersection of Qingyang Road and Longquan Road, Longyang District, Baoshan City, 678000, P. R. China.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13498-1.
The core objective of this study was to precisely locate metastatic lymph nodes, identify potential areas in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients that may not require radiotherapy, and propose a hypothesis for reduced target volume radiotherapy on the basis of these findings. Ultimately, we reassessed the differences in dosimetry of organs at risk (OARs) between reduced target volume (reduced CTV2) radiotherapy and standard radiotherapy.
A total of 209 patients participated in the study. We used image registration techniques to map patients' neck metastatic lymph nodes onto a template CT of healthy individuals. Using MIM software, we integrated all patients' lymph node images onto the template CT images and conducted an in-depth analysis of their distribution characteristics and metastatic patterns. Subsequently, we randomly selected the localization images of 30 patients and used paired t test methods to compare the differences in the dosimetry of target volumes and OARs between reduced target volume radiotherapy and standard radiotherapy.
A total of 2314 metastatic lymph nodes were identified and mapped. There were no metastatic lymph nodes observed at level VIIb or within the lateral border of the common carotid artery. The percentages of metastatic lymph nodes at levels Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, III, IVa, IVb, Va, Vb, Vc, VIa, VIb, VIIa, VIIb and VIII accounted for 0%, 1.5%, 22.8%, 41.1%, 15.9%, 3.0%, 0%, 4.4%, 1.0%, 0.3%, 0%, 0%, 9.7%, 0% and 0.3%, respectively, of the 2314 metastatic lymph nodes. Further analysis of the dosimetric outcomes revealed a significantly lower mean dose to the oral cavity, laryngeal cavity, esophagus, trachea, pharyngeal constrictor muscles, parotid gland, submandibular gland and thyroid gland with the implementation of reduced-target radiotherapy than with standard radiotherapy.
IMRT sparing level I, IVb, VI, and VIIb lymph nodes and the area within the lateral border of the common carotid artery for stage II-IVa NPC patients is feasible. This method can significantly reduce the dose to peripheral organs at risk.
本研究的核心目标是精确定位转移性淋巴结,确定鼻咽癌患者中可能无需放疗的潜在区域,并基于这些发现提出缩小靶区放疗的假设。最终,我们重新评估了缩小靶区(缩小的CTV2)放疗与标准放疗之间危及器官(OARs)剂量学的差异。
共有209名患者参与了本研究。我们使用图像配准技术将患者颈部转移性淋巴结映射到健康个体的模板CT上。使用MIM软件,我们将所有患者的淋巴结图像整合到模板CT图像上,并对其分布特征和转移模式进行了深入分析。随后,我们随机选择30名患者的定位图像,并使用配对t检验方法比较缩小靶区放疗与标准放疗之间靶区体积和OARs剂量学的差异。
共识别并映射了2314个转移性淋巴结。在VIIb水平或颈总动脉外侧边界内未观察到转移性淋巴结。在2314个转移性淋巴结中,Ia、Ib、IIa、IIb、III、IVa、IVb、Va、Vb、Vc、VIa、VIb、VIIa、VIIb和VIII水平的转移性淋巴结百分比分别为0%、1.5%、22.8%、41.1%、15.9%、3.0%、0%、4.4%、1.0%、0.3%、0%、0%、9.7%、0%和0.3%。对剂量学结果的进一步分析显示,与标准放疗相比,实施缩小靶区放疗时口腔、喉腔、食管、气管、咽缩肌、腮腺、下颌下腺和甲状腺的平均剂量显著降低。
对于II-IVa期鼻咽癌患者,调强放疗(IMRT)避开I、IVb、VI和VIIb水平淋巴结以及颈总动脉外侧边界内的区域是可行的。该方法可显著降低对周围危及器官的剂量。