Jiang Chaoyang, Gong Baolin, Gao Hui, Zhang Tao, Li Zhihui, Wang Juan, Zhang Ling
Department of Oncology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, PR China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, PR China.
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Aug;161:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.020. Epub 2021 May 25.
The delineation of intermediate risk nodal regions (CTVn2) and low-risk nodal regions (CTVn3) base on the correlation analysis between neck node levels of NPC has not been reported. We aim to analyze the correlations between different neck node levels in 960 cases of NPC, and to provide preliminary suggestions for clinical target volume (CTV) delineation of NPC base on the correlation analysis.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of 960 NPCs in our institution from 2011 to 2019. Diagnostic head and neck CTs and MRIs were reviewed. The involvements of nodal levels were evaluated according to the 2013 updated guidelines. The correlations between different levels were studied using Chi-square test and logistic regression model.
The top four levels with the highest rate of lymph node metastasis were VIIa(86.35%), IIb(84.06%), IIa(62.29%), and III(47.29%). Correlation analysis showed that lymph node metastasis in level Ib was correlated with levels IIa and III. Level IIa was correlated with levels Ib, IIb, III, and Va. Level IIb was correlated with levels IIa, III, Va, and VIIa. Level III was correlated with levels IIa, IIb, IVa, Va, Vb, VIIa, and T stage. Level IVa was correlated with levels III, IVb, and Va. Level IVb was only correlated with level IVa. Level Va was correlated with levels IIb, III, IVa, Vb, and posterior to level V (PLV region). Level Vb was correlated with levels III, Va, Vc, and PLV region. Level Vc was correlated with levels IVb, Vb, and PLV region. Level VIIa was correlated with levels IIb and III. Level VIIb had no correlations with other levels. Level VIII was correlated with levels Ib and IVb. The PLV region was correlated with levels Va, Vb, and Vc. All the above P values were <0.05.
This study recommends setting the related levels as CTVn2 and the unrelated levels as CTVn3. The levels of nodal spread are different in NPC patients, this study reflects the principle of individualized CTV delineation.
基于鼻咽癌颈部淋巴结分区的相关性分析来界定中危淋巴结区域(CTVn2)和低危淋巴结区域(CTVn3)的研究尚未见报道。我们旨在分析960例鼻咽癌患者不同颈部淋巴结分区之间的相关性,并基于相关性分析为鼻咽癌的临床靶区(CTV)勾画提供初步建议。
我们回顾性分析了2011年至2019年我院960例鼻咽癌患者的病历资料。对诊断性头颈部CT和MRI进行了复查。根据2013年更新的指南评估淋巴结分区的受累情况。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归模型研究不同分区之间的相关性。
淋巴结转移率最高的前四个分区依次为VIIa(86.35%)、IIb(84.06%)、IIa(62.29%)和III(47.29%)。相关性分析显示,Ib区淋巴结转移与IIa区和III区相关。IIa区与Ib区、IIb区、III区和Va区相关。IIb区与IIa区、III区、Va区和VIIa区相关。III区与IIa区、IIb区、IVa区、Va区、Vb区、VIIa区和T分期相关。IVa区与III区、IVb区和Va区相关。IVb区仅与IVa区相关。Va区与IIb区、III区、IVa区、Vb区及V区后方区域(PLV区)相关。Vb区与III区、Va区、Vc区和PLV区相关。Vc区与IVb区、Vb区和PLV区相关。VIIa区与IIb区和III区相关。VIIb区与其他分区均无相关性。VIII区与Ib区和IVb区相关。PLV区与Va区、Vb区和Vc区相关。上述所有P值均<0.05。
本研究建议将相关分区设为CTVn2,不相关分区设为CTVn3。鼻咽癌患者的淋巴结转移分区不同,本研究体现了CTV勾画个体化的原则。