Diniz D-A, França A-J, Laureano-Filho J-R, Pellizzer E-P, Moraes S-L, Vasconcelos B-C
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dental School, University of Pernambuco Arnóbio Marques St., 310 Zip code 50100-130, Recife, PE, Brazil
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Mar 1;30(2):e160-e169. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26439.
This review aimed to assess if the use of dexmedetomidine as an additive to local anesthetics promotes greater safety and efficacy than local anesthetics alone in dental procedures.
the systematic review was structured according to the PICO strategy and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Studies were included based on the eligibility criteria, and data from the included studies were collected by one author. An additional author reviewed the compilation. Altogether, nine studies were included: eight randomized clinical trials and one controlled clinical trial. Of these, six were related to tooth extraction. Most studies reported the use of lidocaine as the local anesthetic. Levobupivacaine was used in one study.
In total, 352 patients were evaluated. Despite the heterogeneity between studies, it can be suggested that when used as an additive to local anesthetics, dexmedetomidine has the potential to decrease postoperative pain and latency period and prolong anesthetic duration.
There are scant reviews that summarizes the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics. These studies can positively impact the lives of the concerned population.
本综述旨在评估在牙科手术中,右美托咪定作为局部麻醉剂的添加剂使用,是否比单独使用局部麻醉剂更具安全性和有效性。
本系统综述根据PICO策略构建,并遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单。根据纳入标准纳入研究,由一位作者收集纳入研究的数据。另一位作者对汇编进行了审查。总共纳入了9项研究:8项随机临床试验和1项对照临床试验。其中,6项与拔牙有关。大多数研究报告使用利多卡因作为局部麻醉剂。一项研究使用了左旋布比卡因。
总共评估了352例患者。尽管研究之间存在异质性,但可以认为,当右美托咪定作为局部麻醉剂的添加剂使用时,它有可能减轻术后疼痛、缩短潜伏期并延长麻醉持续时间。
很少有综述总结右美托咪定作为局部麻醉剂辅助剂的有效性。这些研究可以对相关人群的生活产生积极影响。