Huerta María Dolores Rodríguez, Giralt Juan Antonio Sánchez, Díez-Fernández Ana, Alonso María Jesús Rodríguez, Montes Nuria, Suárez-Sipmann Fernando
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain; Social and Health Care Research Centre, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr;87:103952. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103952. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
To analyse the effects on respiratory function, lung volume and the regional distribution of ventilation and perfusion of routine postural repositioning in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Prospective descriptive physiological study. We evaluated gas-exchange, lung mechanics, and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) determined end-expiratory lung impedance and regional ventilation and perfusion distribution in five body positions: supine-baseline (S1); first lateralisation at 30° (L1); second supine position (S2), second contralateral lateralisation (L2) and third final supine position (S3). To evaluate the effects of lateral repositioning we compared S1 with S2 and with the changes during L1 and L2.
We included 32 patients. The lateralisation sequence was well tolerated. When comparing S1 with S3 respiratory system compliance increased by 7 % (p = 0.021), the partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO/FiO) by 16 % (p = 0.06) and dead-space decreased by 5 % (p = 0.09). During lateralisation, haemodynamic parameters and PaO/FiO did not change, while dead-space and PaCO presented small non-significant increases. Although with great inter-individual variability, end-expiratory lung impedance increased in the non-dependent 163 ± 123 ml and dependent lung 69 ± 119 ml, both p < 0.009). Regional ventilation decreased in the non-dependent and increased in the dependent lung, while regional perfusion decreased in the dependent lung, especially in dorsal regions.
Postural changes are well tolerated, result in improved lung mechanics and have a positive effect on gas exchange. Lateralisation does not result in a decrease in lung volume in the dependent lung.
Postural repositioning can be safely performed in ICU patients to foster its known benefits. To the known beneficial effects on the prevention of pressure wounds, postural changes can improve regional end-expiratory lung volume (i.e., the functional volume of the lung). Regional changes vary among patients and extended monitoring options such as EIT can help to individualise this useful therapeutic intervention.
分析常规体位重新摆放对机械通气重症患者呼吸功能、肺容积以及通气和灌注的区域分布的影响。
前瞻性描述性生理学研究。我们评估了五个体位下的气体交换、肺力学以及电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)测定的呼气末肺阻抗和区域通气及灌注分布,这五个体位分别为:仰卧位基线(S1);30°首次侧卧位(L1);第二次仰卧位(S2),第二次对侧侧卧位(L2)以及第三次最终仰卧位(S3)。为评估侧卧位重新摆放的效果,我们将S1与S2进行比较,并比较L1和L2期间的变化。
我们纳入了32例患者。侧卧位顺序耐受性良好。将S1与S3比较时,呼吸系统顺应性增加了7%(p = 0.021),氧分压与吸入氧分数之比(PaO/FiO)增加了16%(p = 0.06),死腔减少了5%(p = 0.09)。在侧卧位期间,血流动力学参数和PaO/FiO没有变化,而死腔和PaCO有小幅但无统计学意义的增加。尽管个体间差异很大,但非下垂肺的呼气末肺阻抗增加了163±123 ml,下垂肺增加了69±119 ml,两者p均<0.009)。非下垂肺区域通气减少,下垂肺区域通气增加,而下垂肺区域灌注减少,尤其是在背部区域。
体位改变耐受性良好,可改善肺力学,并对气体交换有积极影响。侧卧位不会导致下垂肺肺容积减少。
在ICU患者中可以安全地进行体位重新摆放,以促进其已知的益处。除了对预防压疮的已知有益作用外,体位改变还可以改善区域呼气末肺容积(即肺的功能容积)。患者之间的区域变化各不相同,像EIT这样扩展的监测选项有助于使这种有用的治疗干预个体化。