Suppr超能文献

序贯侧卧位作为一种新的肺复张手法:对早期机械通气的新冠病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的探索性研究

Sequential lateral positioning as a new lung recruitment maneuver: an exploratory study in early mechanically ventilated Covid-19 ARDS patients.

作者信息

Roldán Rollin, Rodriguez Shalim, Barriga Fernando, Tucci Mauro, Victor Marcus, Alcala Glasiele, Villamonte Renán, Suárez-Sipmann Fernando, Amato Marcelo, Brochard Laurent, Tusman Gerardo

机构信息

Laboratorio de Fisiología Experimental, Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de Piura, Lima, Peru.

Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Rebagliati, Lima, Peru.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Feb 12;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-00988-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A sequential change in body position from supine-to-both lateral positions under constant ventilatory settings could be used as a postural recruitment maneuver in case of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), provided that sufficient positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) prevents derecruitment. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and physiological effects of a sequential postural recruitment maneuver in early mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 15 patients receiving lung-protective mechanical ventilation in volume-controlled with PEEP based on recruitability were prospectively enrolled and evaluated in five sequentially applied positions for 30 min each: Supine-baseline; Lateral-1st side; 2nd Supine; Lateral-2nd side; Supine-final. PEEP level was selected using the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I ratio) based on which patients received PEEP 12 cmHO for R/I ratio ≤ 0.5 or PEEP 15 cmHO for R/I ratio > 0.5. At the end of each period, we measured respiratory mechanics, arterial blood gases, lung ultrasound aeration, end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI), and regional distribution of ventilation and perfusion using electric impedance tomography (EIT).

RESULTS

Comparing supine baseline and final, respiratory compliance (29 ± 9 vs 32 ± 8 mL/cmHO; p < 0.01) and PaO/FIO ratio (138 ± 36 vs 164 ± 46 mmHg; p < 0.01) increased, while driving pressure (13 ± 2 vs 11 ± 2 cmHO; p < 0.01) and lung ultrasound consolidation score decreased [5 (4-5) vs 2 (1-4); p < 0.01]. EELI decreased ventrally (218 ± 205 mL; p < 0.01) and increased dorsally (192 ± 475 mL; p = 0.02), while regional compliance increased in both ventral (11.5 ± 0.7 vs 12.9 ± 0.8 mL/cmHO; p < 0.01) and dorsal regions (17.1 ± 1.8 vs 18.8 ± 1.8 mL/cmHO; p < 0.01). Dorsal distribution of perfusion increased (64.8 ± 7.3% vs 66.3 ± 7.2%; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Without increasing airway pressure, a sequential postural recruitment maneuver improves global and regional respiratory mechanics and gas exchange along with a redistribution of EELI from ventral to dorsal lung areas and less consolidation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04475068. Registered 17 July 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04475068.

摘要

背景

在持续通气设置下,从仰卧位依次变换至双侧卧位的体位改变可作为急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的一种体位复张手法,前提是足够的呼气末正压(PEEP)可防止肺复张不全。本研究旨在评估早期机械通气的新型冠状病毒肺炎相关性ARDS患者采用序贯体位复张手法的可行性及生理效应。

方法

前瞻性纳入15例接受肺保护性机械通气、采用基于可复张性设置PEEP的容量控制通气的患者,并对其在五个依次应用的体位下各进行30分钟的评估:仰卧位-基线;侧卧位-第一侧;第二次仰卧位;侧卧位-第二侧;仰卧位-最终。根据复张与充气比(R/I比)选择PEEP水平,R/I比≤0.5的患者接受PEEP 12 cmH₂O,R/I比>0.5的患者接受PEEP 15 cmH₂O。在每个阶段结束时,我们测量呼吸力学、动脉血气、肺部超声通气情况、呼气末肺阻抗(EELI),并使用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)测量通气和灌注的区域分布。

结果

比较仰卧位基线和最终体位,呼吸顺应性(29±9 vs 32±8 mL/cmH₂O;p<0.01)和PaO₂/FIO₂比值(138±36 vs 164±46 mmHg;p<0.01)升高,而驱动压(13±2 vs 11±2 cmH₂O;p<0.01)和肺部超声实变评分降低[5(4 - 5)vs 2(1 - 4);p<0.01]。EELI在腹侧降低(218±205 mL;p<0.01),在背侧升高(192±475 mL;p = 0.02),而腹侧(11.5±0.7 vs 12.9±0.8 mL/cmH₂O;p<0.01)和背侧区域(17.1±1.8 vs 18.8±1.8 mL/cmH₂O;p<0.01)的区域顺应性均增加。背侧灌注分布增加(64.8±7.3% vs 66.3±7.2%;p = 0.01)。

结论

在不增加气道压力的情况下,序贯体位复张手法可改善整体和区域呼吸力学及气体交换,同时使EELI从腹侧肺区向背侧肺区重新分布,并减少实变。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04475068。于2020年7月17日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04475068。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/351a/8840950/78973708a52d/13613_2022_988_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验