• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重性情感障碍的家族遗传。是否有证据支持单相障碍和双相障碍之间的区别?

Familial transmission of major affective disorders. Is there evidence supporting the distinction between unipolar and bipolar disorders?

作者信息

Tsuang M T, Faraone S V, Fleming J A

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;146:268-71. doi: 10.1192/bjp.146.3.268.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.146.3.268
PMID:3986436
Abstract

The two-threshold multifactorial polygenic (MFP) model was applied to blind family study data, collected in a long-term follow-up and family study of major affective disorders. This model tested whether bipolar and unipolar disorders are manifestations of the same underlying factors or if they are independently caused disorders. The hypothesis that bipolar and unipolar disorders are, respectively, severe and mild forms of the same disorder was supported. There was little evidence for different familial aetiologies for bipolar and unipolar disorders in our sample.

摘要

双阈值多因素多基因(MFP)模型应用于在一项针对重性情感障碍的长期随访和家族研究中收集的盲法家族研究数据。该模型检验了双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍是同一潜在因素的表现形式,还是由独立病因导致的疾病。双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍分别是同一疾病的重度和轻度形式这一假设得到了支持。在我们的样本中,几乎没有证据表明双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍存在不同的家族病因。

相似文献

1
Familial transmission of major affective disorders. Is there evidence supporting the distinction between unipolar and bipolar disorders?重性情感障碍的家族遗传。是否有证据支持单相障碍和双相障碍之间的区别?
Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;146:268-71. doi: 10.1192/bjp.146.3.268.
2
Schizoaffective disorder and affective disorders with mood-incongruent psychotic features: keep separate or combine? Evidence from a family study.精神分裂症伴情感障碍及具有心境不协调精神病性特征的情感障碍:分开还是合并?来自一项家系研究的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;149(12):1666-73. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.12.1666.
3
Gender differences in bipolar affective disorder.双相情感障碍中的性别差异。
J Affect Disord. 1981 Sep;3(3):261-71. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(81)90027-6.
4
Application of polygenic threshold models in the etiology of affective disorders.多基因阈值模型在情感障碍病因学中的应用。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 1997;39(2):64-70.
5
The Iowa 500: affective disorder in relatives of manic and depressed patients.爱荷华500研究:躁狂症和抑郁症患者亲属中的情感障碍
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Feb;139(2):209-12. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.2.209.
6
Is there a common genetic factor in bipolar and unipolar affective disorder?双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍是否存在共同的遗传因素?
Compr Psychiatry. 1980 Nov-Dec;21(6):460-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(80)90048-6.
7
Age-of-onset and genetic transmission in affective disorders.情感障碍的发病年龄与遗传传递
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1981 Nov;64(5):373-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00796.x.
8
Morbidity risks of schizophrenia and affective disorders among first degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, mania, depression and surgical conditions.精神分裂症、躁狂症、抑郁症患者及外科疾病患者的一级亲属中患精神分裂症和情感障碍的发病风险。
Br J Psychiatry. 1980 Dec;137:497-504. doi: 10.1192/bjp.137.6.497.
9
Suicide attempts and clinical risk factors in patients with bipolar and unipolar affective disorders.双相和单相情感障碍患者的自杀企图和临床风险因素。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
The familial aggregation of psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder pedigrees.双相情感障碍谱系中精神病性症状的家族聚集性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;158(8):1258-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.8.1258.

引用本文的文献

1
Specificity of psychosis, mania and major depression in a contemporary family study.当代家庭研究中的精神病、躁狂症和重度抑郁症的特异性。
Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;19(2):209-13. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.132. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
2
Depression as unhomelike being-in-the-world? Phenomenology's challenge to our understanding of illness.抑郁是一种无家可归的在世状态?现象学对我们理解疾病的挑战。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Feb;16(1):31-9. doi: 10.1007/s11019-012-9409-5.
3
Current perspectives on the genetics of unipolar depression.单相抑郁症遗传学的当前观点。
Behav Genet. 1991 May;21(3):211-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01065817.