Suppr超能文献

构建和验证预测局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后Gleason分级组升级的模型:机器学习算法与传统逻辑回归的比较

Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression.

作者信息

Gui Qian, Wang Xin, Wu Dandan, Guo Yonglian

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China,

Department of Urological Tumor Surgery, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Oncology. 2025 Jan 24:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000543492.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The occurrence of Gleason grade group upgrading (GGU) significantly impacts treatment strategy developments. We aimed to develop an optimal predictive model to assess the risk of GGU in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), by comparing traditional logistic regression (LR) with seven machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of clinical data was conducted on patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Wuhan Central Hospital (January 2017 to December 2023, n = 177) and Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (July 2019 to February 2024, n = 87). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was employed to filter the clinical characteristics of patients. Subsequently, models were conducted using multivariate LR, along with seven diverse machine learning algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, multilayer perceptron, naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machine. By employing the receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, brier score, recall, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we compared the predictive capabilities and clinical utility of eight models to identify the optimal one.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of eight models, the LR model demonstrated superior performance. In the modeling set, it achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.808-0.845), accuracy of 0.765, and a brier score of 0.167. In the validation set, it kept good results with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.758-0.880), accuracy of 0.725, and a brier score of 0.180. The calibration curves, brier score, and DCA also demonstrated the excellent calibration and net benefit of the LR model.

CONCLUSIONS

After conducting a comprehensive multi-model comparison, we concluded that the LR model was optimal for predicting GGU, which was confirmed by external validation. Our study also revealed percent free prostate-specific antigen density as a predictive factor for GGU, offering a novel approach for managing localized PCa patients.

摘要

引言

格里森分级组升级(GGU)的发生对治疗策略的制定有重大影响。我们旨在通过将传统逻辑回归(LR)与七种机器学习算法进行比较,开发一种最佳预测模型,以评估局限性前列腺癌(PCa)患者发生GGU的风险。

方法

对在武汉中心医院(2017年1月至2023年12月,n = 177)和江西省肿瘤医院(2019年7月至2024年2月,n = 87)接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行临床数据的回顾性收集。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归来筛选患者的临床特征。随后,使用多变量LR以及七种不同的机器学习算法构建模型:极端梯度提升、决策树、多层感知器、朴素贝叶斯、K近邻、随机森林和支持向量机。通过使用受试者工作特征曲线、准确率、布里尔评分、召回率、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA),我们比较了八个模型的预测能力和临床实用性,以确定最佳模型。

结果

在对八个模型的评估中,LR模型表现出卓越的性能。在建模集中,其曲线下面积(AUC)为0.826(95%CI:0.808 - 0.845),准确率为0.765,布里尔评分为0.167。在验证集中,其保持了良好的结果,AUC为0.819(95%CI:0.758 - 0.880),准确率为0.725,布里尔评分为0.180。校准曲线、布里尔评分和DCA也证明了LR模型具有出色的校准和净效益。

结论

在进行全面的多模型比较后,我们得出结论,LR模型是预测GGU的最佳模型,这一点得到了外部验证的证实。我们的研究还揭示了游离前列腺特异性抗原密度百分比作为GGU的预测因素,为局限性PCa患者的管理提供了一种新方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验