• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术切缘阳性多变量预测模型的外部验证

External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery.

作者信息

Manhoobi Irina Palimaru, Ellbrant Julia, Bendahl Pär-Ola, Redsted Søren, Bodilsen Anne, Tramm Trine, Christiansen Peer, Rydén Lisa

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jan 27;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07103-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-025-07103-8
PMID:39865247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11770974/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) most often demands a repeat surgery. To preoperatively identify patients at risk of positive margins, a multivariable model has been developed that predicts positive margins after BCS with a high accuracy. This study aimed to externally validate this prediction model to explore its generalizability and assess if additional preoperatively available variables can further improve its predictive accuracy. The validation cohort included 225 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark during 2020-2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration analysis were used to validate the prediction model. Univariable logistic regression was used to evaluate if additional variables available in the validation cohort were associated with positive margins and backward elimination to explore if these variables could further improve the model´s predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

The AUC of the model was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50-0.70) indicating a lower discriminative capacity in the external cohort. We found weak evidence for an association between increased preoperative breast density on mammography and positive resection margins after BCS (p = 0.027), but the AUC of the model did not improve, when mammographic breast density was included as an additional variable in the model.

摘要

目的

保乳手术(BCS)后切缘阳性通常需要再次手术。为了术前识别有切缘阳性风险的患者,已开发出一种多变量模型,该模型能高精度预测BCS后的切缘阳性情况。本研究旨在对该预测模型进行外部验证,以探索其普遍性,并评估术前可用的其他变量是否能进一步提高其预测准确性。验证队列包括2020年至2022年期间在丹麦奥胡斯大学医院接受BCS的225例浸润性乳腺癌患者。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)和校准分析来验证预测模型。单变量逻辑回归用于评估验证队列中可用的其他变量是否与切缘阳性相关,向后逐步回归用于探索这些变量是否能进一步提高模型的预测准确性。

结果

该模型的AUC为0.60(95%CI:0.50 - 0.70),表明在外部队列中的判别能力较低。我们发现乳腺钼靶检查显示术前乳腺密度增加与BCS后切缘阳性之间存在关联的证据较弱(p = 0.027),但当将乳腺钼靶检查的乳腺密度作为额外变量纳入模型时,模型的AUC并未改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e33/11770974/dababf8adc2c/13104_2025_7103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e33/11770974/900794e3b04f/13104_2025_7103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e33/11770974/dababf8adc2c/13104_2025_7103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e33/11770974/900794e3b04f/13104_2025_7103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e33/11770974/dababf8adc2c/13104_2025_7103_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术切缘阳性多变量预测模型的外部验证
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jan 27;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07103-8.
2
External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.预测保乳手术前切缘阳性的列线图的外部验证和修正。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):373-380. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05779-z. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
3
Validated prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery based exclusively on preoperative data.仅基于术前数据的保乳手术中切缘阳性的验证预测模型。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab092.
4
The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients Recalled at Biennial Screening Mammography: An Observational Cohort Study.术前乳腺 MRI 对在每两年一次的筛查性乳房 X 光检查中召回的乳腺癌患者手术切缘状态的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):5929-5938. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09868-1. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
[Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].[术前动态对比增强磁共振成像可降低早期非肿块型乳腺癌患者保乳手术后肿瘤阳性切缘率]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 23;39(10):768-774. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.10.010.
6
Prediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancer.预测触诊阴性乳腺癌患者的阳性切缘。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.08.474. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
7
Lack of definitive presurgical pathological diagnosis is associated with inadequate surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery.术前病理诊断不明确与保乳手术中手术切缘不足有关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2483-2491. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.047. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?乳腺钼靶密度对保乳手术后切缘再次切除率有影响吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):782-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4917-1. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
9
Positive margins prediction in breast cancer conservative surgery: Assessment of a preoperative web-based nomogram.乳腺癌保乳手术切缘阳性预测:基于网络的术前列线图评估
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
10
Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后切缘阳性的预测列线图。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Aug;134(3):1115-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2124-3. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.早期乳腺癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2024 Feb;35(2):159-182. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus X-ray of the breast specimen for intraoperative margin assessment: A randomized trial.数字乳腺断层合成与 X 射线乳腺标本用于术中切缘评估的比较:一项随机试验。
Breast. 2024 Feb;73:103616. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103616. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
3
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Positive Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
保乳手术切缘阳性预测模型的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2022 May 12;12:875665. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.875665. eCollection 2022.
4
Validated prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery based exclusively on preoperative data.仅基于术前数据的保乳手术中切缘阳性的验证预测模型。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab092.
5
The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients Recalled at Biennial Screening Mammography: An Observational Cohort Study.术前乳腺 MRI 对在每两年一次的筛查性乳房 X 光检查中召回的乳腺癌患者手术切缘状态的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):5929-5938. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09868-1. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?预后模型的外部验证:是什么、为什么、如何、何时以及何地?
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Nov 24;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Achieving margin clearance following oncoplastic breast surgery in comparison with simple wide local excision: a three-dimensional specimen assessment.与单纯广泛局部切除相比,肿瘤整形乳房手术后切缘阴性的实现:三维标本评估
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Nov;90(11):2346-2352. doi: 10.1111/ans.16222. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.预测保乳手术前切缘阳性的列线图的外部验证和修正。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Sep;183(2):373-380. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05779-z. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?乳腺癌保乳治疗患者的乳腺密度是否会增加再次切除的风险?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4246-4253. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07647-7. Epub 2019 Aug 8.