• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Seeing Ourselves in Others: Understanding and Addressing Biases in Medical School Admissions Processes.从他人身上审视自己:理解并解决医学院招生过程中的偏见问题。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;14(1):20-30. doi: 10.5334/pme.1643. eCollection 2025.
2
"My Autism Is My Own": Autistic Identity and Intersectionality in the School Context.“我的自闭症属于我自己”:学校环境中的自闭症身份认同与交叉性
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Dec 1;4(4):315-327. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0087. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Racial/Gender Biases in Student Clinical Decision-Making: a Mixed-Method Study of Medical School Attributes Associated with Lower Incidence of Biases.学生临床决策中的种族/性别偏见:与偏见发生率较低相关的医学院属性的混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2056-2064. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4543-2. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Implicit Racial Bias in Medical School Admissions.医学院招生中的隐性种族偏见。
Acad Med. 2017 Mar;92(3):365-369. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001388.
5
Evaluation and Assessment of the ABATE Framework to Enhance Implicit Bias Training for Virtual Interviews in Medical Schools.评估 ABATE 框架以增强医学院虚拟面试中的隐性偏见培训。
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Jun 28;20:11416. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11416. eCollection 2024.
6
An equivalence study of interview platform: Does videoconference technology impact medical school acceptance rates of different groups?访谈平台的等效性研究:视频会议技术是否会影响医学院对不同群体的录取率?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Aug;23(3):601-610. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9817-2. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
7
Underrepresented Minorities in Medical School Admissions: A Qualitative Study.医学院招生中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项定性研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):31-41. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1220861. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Student, Faculty, and Coach Perspectives on Why Athletes Excel in Medical School: A Qualitative Analysis.学生、教师和教练对运动员为何能在医学院表现出色的看法:定性分析。
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):43-59. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1921584. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
9
Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers: comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions.学生与教职员工作为招生面试官:评分数据和招生决策的比较。
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):458-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318249687d.
10
Diversity in membership of medical school admissions committees.医学院招生委员会成员的多样性。
J Med Educ. 1984 Aug;59(8):634-42. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198408000-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
Supreme Court cases on affirmative action threaten diversity in medicine.美国最高法院关于平权行动的案件威胁到医学领域的多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 25;120(17):e2220919120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220919120. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
"Time-In": A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings.“时间投入”:一种用于打断医学院招生委员会会议偏见的工具。
Acad Med. 2023 May 1;98(5):580-584. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005082. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
3
Examining the Impact of Dialogic Learning on Critically Reflective Practice.探讨对话式学习对批判性反思实践的影响。
Acad Med. 2022 Nov 1;97(11S):S71-S79. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004916. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
4
Strategies For Enhancing Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Medical School Admissions-A Canadian Medical School's Journey.加强医学院招生中的公平、多样性和包容性的策略——加拿大一所医学院的历程。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;10:879173. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879173. eCollection 2022.
5
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
6
Moving Beyond Implicit Bias in Antiracist Academic Medicine Initiatives.超越反种族主义学术医学倡议中的隐性偏见。
Acad Med. 2022 Jun 1;97(6):790-792. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004562. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Beyond the Guise of Saturation: Rigor and Qualitative Interview Data.超越饱和度表象:严谨性与定性访谈数据
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Oct;13(5):607-611. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00752.1. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
8
Implicit Bias Recognition and Management in Interpersonal Encounters and the Learning Environment: A Skills-Based Curriculum for Medical Students.人际互动和学习环境中的隐性偏见识别与管理:面向医学生的基于技能的课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jul 13;17:11168. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11168. eCollection 2021.
9
A multi-pronged, antiracist approach to optimize equity in medical school admissions.采取多管齐下的反种族主义措施,优化医学院招生中的公平性。
Med Educ. 2021 Dec;55(12):1376-1382. doi: 10.1111/medu.14589. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
10
Implicit Bias Recognition and Management: Tailored Instruction for Faculty.隐性偏见的识别与管理:针对教师的定制化培训
J Natl Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;113(5):566-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

从他人身上审视自己:理解并解决医学院招生过程中的偏见问题。

Seeing Ourselves in Others: Understanding and Addressing Biases in Medical School Admissions Processes.

作者信息

Ahmed Khadija, Joy Tisha, Sukhera Javeed

机构信息

Undergraduate Medical Education, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;14(1):20-30. doi: 10.5334/pme.1643. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5334/pme.1643
PMID:39866744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11758812/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Medical school admissions is a vital area for advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Integrating bias recognition and management (BRM) within the context of admissions is critical in advancing DEI. However, there is a dearth of empirically informed literature on BRM in the admissions context. Therefore, this study sought to explore how individuals involved in admissions decisions process and integrate bias related feedback.

METHODS

The authors conducted a qualitative exploratory study using constructivist grounded theory. 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with various participants in the admissions process at a North American medical school who had participated in bias related training. Participants included medical school faculty, senior medical students, and community volunteers.

RESULTS

Overall, participants expressed diverse perspectives on their personal biases and how these biases impact admissions decisions. Their reflections were shaped by their identities, values, and priorities, which varied based on whether they were faculty members, students, or community members. Participants also highlighted that their biases influenced their perceptions of the ideal admissions candidate, thus influencing their decision-making process. They emphasized the need for more opportunities to engage in dialogue with peers to openly share and discuss how to recognize and manage their biases.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that fostering critical reflection about identity tensions, building and sustaining a community of practice, and facilitating sustained dialogue may provide admissions committees with an evidence-informed, meaningful, and sustained approach to advancing DEI through bias recognition and management.

摘要

目的

医学院招生是促进多元化、公平和包容(DEI)的重要领域。在招生过程中融入偏见识别与管理(BRM)对于推进DEI至关重要。然而,在招生背景下,缺乏基于实证的关于BRM的文献。因此,本研究旨在探讨参与招生决策过程的人员如何处理和整合与偏见相关的反馈。

方法

作者采用建构主义扎根理论进行了一项定性探索性研究。对北美一所医学院招生过程中的各类参与者进行了21次半结构化访谈,这些参与者都参加过与偏见相关的培训。参与者包括医学院教师、高年级医学生和社区志愿者。

结果

总体而言,参与者对其个人偏见以及这些偏见如何影响招生决策表达了不同的观点。他们的反思受到其身份、价值观和优先事项的影响,这些因他们是教师、学生还是社区成员而有所不同。参与者还强调,他们的偏见影响了他们对理想招生候选人的看法,从而影响了他们的决策过程。他们强调需要有更多机会与同行进行对话,以公开分享和讨论如何识别和管理自己的偏见。

结论

我们的研究表明,促进对身份紧张关系的批判性反思、建立和维持一个实践社区以及促进持续对话,可能为招生委员会提供一种基于证据、有意义且持续的方法,通过偏见识别和管理来推进DEI。