Ahmed Khadija, Joy Tisha, Sukhera Javeed
Undergraduate Medical Education, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;14(1):20-30. doi: 10.5334/pme.1643. eCollection 2025.
Medical school admissions is a vital area for advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Integrating bias recognition and management (BRM) within the context of admissions is critical in advancing DEI. However, there is a dearth of empirically informed literature on BRM in the admissions context. Therefore, this study sought to explore how individuals involved in admissions decisions process and integrate bias related feedback.
The authors conducted a qualitative exploratory study using constructivist grounded theory. 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with various participants in the admissions process at a North American medical school who had participated in bias related training. Participants included medical school faculty, senior medical students, and community volunteers.
Overall, participants expressed diverse perspectives on their personal biases and how these biases impact admissions decisions. Their reflections were shaped by their identities, values, and priorities, which varied based on whether they were faculty members, students, or community members. Participants also highlighted that their biases influenced their perceptions of the ideal admissions candidate, thus influencing their decision-making process. They emphasized the need for more opportunities to engage in dialogue with peers to openly share and discuss how to recognize and manage their biases.
Our study suggests that fostering critical reflection about identity tensions, building and sustaining a community of practice, and facilitating sustained dialogue may provide admissions committees with an evidence-informed, meaningful, and sustained approach to advancing DEI through bias recognition and management.
医学院招生是促进多元化、公平和包容(DEI)的重要领域。在招生过程中融入偏见识别与管理(BRM)对于推进DEI至关重要。然而,在招生背景下,缺乏基于实证的关于BRM的文献。因此,本研究旨在探讨参与招生决策过程的人员如何处理和整合与偏见相关的反馈。
作者采用建构主义扎根理论进行了一项定性探索性研究。对北美一所医学院招生过程中的各类参与者进行了21次半结构化访谈,这些参与者都参加过与偏见相关的培训。参与者包括医学院教师、高年级医学生和社区志愿者。
总体而言,参与者对其个人偏见以及这些偏见如何影响招生决策表达了不同的观点。他们的反思受到其身份、价值观和优先事项的影响,这些因他们是教师、学生还是社区成员而有所不同。参与者还强调,他们的偏见影响了他们对理想招生候选人的看法,从而影响了他们的决策过程。他们强调需要有更多机会与同行进行对话,以公开分享和讨论如何识别和管理自己的偏见。
我们的研究表明,促进对身份紧张关系的批判性反思、建立和维持一个实践社区以及促进持续对话,可能为招生委员会提供一种基于证据、有意义且持续的方法,通过偏见识别和管理来推进DEI。