• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能辅助的暴露-反应数据分析:量化暴露对生存时间的异质因果效应。

AI-assisted exposure-response data analysis: Quantifying heterogeneous causal effects of exposures on survival times.

作者信息

Cox Louis Anthony, Lewis R Jeffrey, Rege Saumitra V, Singh Shubham

机构信息

Cox Associates, Entanglement, and University of Colorado. 503 N. Franklin Street, Denver, Colorado, 80218, USA.

Kelly Services, Epidemiology Contractor (retired ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc.), Lavallette, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Glob Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 25;9:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100179. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100179
PMID:39867293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11757793/
Abstract

AI-assisted data analysis can help risk analysts better understand exposure-response relationships by making it relatively easy to apply advanced statistical and machine learning methods, check their assumptions, and interpret their results. This paper demonstrates the potential of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, to facilitate statistical analyses, including survival data analyses, for health risk assessments. Through AI-guided analyses using relatively recent and advanced methods such as Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) plots using Random Survival Forests and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTEs) estimated using Causal Survival Forests, population-level exposure-response functions can be disaggregated into individual-level exposure-response functions. These reveal the extent of heterogeneity in risks across individuals for different levels of exposure, holding other variables fixed. By applying these methods to an illustrative dataset on blood lead levels (BLL) and mortality risk among never-smoker men from the NHANES III survey, we show how AI can clarify inter-individual variations in exposure-associated risks. The results add insights not easily obtained from traditional parametric or semi-parametric models such as logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, illustrating the advantages of non-parametric approaches for quantifying heterogeneous causal effects on survival times. This paper also suggests some practical implications of using AI in regulatory health risk assessments and public policy decisions.

摘要

人工智能辅助数据分析可以帮助风险分析师更好地理解暴露-反应关系,因为它能相对轻松地应用先进的统计和机器学习方法、检验其假设并解释结果。本文展示了诸如ChatGPT等大语言模型在促进健康风险评估的统计分析(包括生存数据分析)方面的潜力。通过使用相对新颖和先进的方法(如使用随机生存森林的个体条件期望(ICE)图以及使用因果生存森林估计的异质性治疗效果(HTE))进行人工智能引导的分析,可以将人群水平的暴露-反应函数分解为个体水平的暴露-反应函数。这些函数揭示了在其他变量固定的情况下,不同暴露水平个体之间风险的异质性程度。通过将这些方法应用于美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III)中从不吸烟男性的血铅水平(BLL)和死亡风险的说明性数据集,我们展示了人工智能如何阐明暴露相关风险的个体间差异。结果提供了传统参数或半参数模型(如逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型)不易获得的见解,说明了非参数方法在量化对生存时间的异质性因果效应方面的优势。本文还提出了在监管健康风险评估和公共政策决策中使用人工智能的一些实际影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/b58a418c1379/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/e53389dfe2a8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/0a49a581a83c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/fd08ed376851/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/de16d826e29d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/cdec7af589d7/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/1cfcdec7d8d9/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/6345be230bae/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/201e2c5ee352/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/6c2faa52d12f/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/1297edda9c4e/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/b58a418c1379/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/e53389dfe2a8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/0a49a581a83c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/fd08ed376851/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/de16d826e29d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/cdec7af589d7/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/1cfcdec7d8d9/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/6345be230bae/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/201e2c5ee352/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/6c2faa52d12f/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/1297edda9c4e/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ba/11757793/b58a418c1379/gr11.jpg

相似文献

1
AI-assisted exposure-response data analysis: Quantifying heterogeneous causal effects of exposures on survival times.人工智能辅助的暴露-反应数据分析:量化暴露对生存时间的异质因果效应。
Glob Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 25;9:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100179. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Application of causal forests to randomised controlled trial data to identify heterogeneous treatment effects: a case study.将因果森林应用于随机对照试验数据以识别异质性治疗效果:一项案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02489-2.
3
Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.个人对挥发性有机化合物混合物的暴露:RIOPA数据的建模与进一步分析
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2014 Jun(181):3-63.
4
Outcome risk model development for heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses: a comparison of non-parametric machine learning methods and semi-parametric statistical methods.治疗效果分析异质性的结局风险模型开发:非参数机器学习方法与半参数统计方法的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02265-8.
5
Generative Large Language Model-Powered Conversational AI App for Personalized Risk Assessment: Case Study in COVID-19.用于个性化风险评估的生成式大语言模型驱动的对话式人工智能应用程序:COVID-19案例研究
JMIR AI. 2025 Mar 27;4:e67363. doi: 10.2196/67363.
6
Using Bayesian networks to clarify interpretation of exposure-response regression coefficients: blood lead-mortality association as an example.运用贝叶斯网络厘清暴露-反应回归系数的解读:以血铅-死亡率关联为例。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020 Aug;50(7):539-550. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1787329. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Utilizing large language models for gastroenterology research: a conceptual framework.利用大语言模型进行胃肠病学研究:一个概念框架。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;18:17562848251328577. doi: 10.1177/17562848251328577. eCollection 2025.
8
Harnessing causal forests for epidemiologic research: key considerations.利用因果森林进行流行病学研究:关键考虑因素。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 3;193(6):813-818. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae003.
9
Causal Artificial Intelligence Models of Food Quality Data.食品质量数据的因果人工智能模型。
Food Technol Biotechnol. 2024 Mar;62(1):102-109. doi: 10.17113/ftb.62.01.24.8301.
10
Perspective review: Will generative AI make common data models obsolete in future analyses of distributed data networks?观点综述:生成式人工智能会使通用数据模型在分布式数据网络的未来分析中过时吗?
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 Apr 21;16:20420986251332743. doi: 10.1177/20420986251332743. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
An AI assistant for critically assessing and synthesizing clusters of journal articles.一种用于批判性评估和综合期刊文章群组的人工智能助手。
Glob Epidemiol. 2025 May 23;10:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2025.100207. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Mathematical optimization in classification and regression trees.分类与回归树中的数学优化
Top (Berl). 2021;29(1):5-33. doi: 10.1007/s11750-021-00594-1. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
What is an exposure-response curve?什么是暴露-反应曲线?
Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 15;6:100114. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100114. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
A Visual Analytics Conceptual Framework for Explorable and Steerable Partial Dependence Analysis.用于可探索和可控局部依赖分析的可视化分析概念框架。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2024 Aug;30(8):4497-4513. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3263739. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
4
Random survival forests for dynamic predictions of a time-to-event outcome using a longitudinal biomarker.使用纵向生物标志物对事件时间结果进行动态预测的随机生存森林。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01375-x.
5
Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data using machine learning.利用机器学习估计观察性数据中异质生存治疗效果。
Stat Med. 2021 Sep 20;40(21):4691-4713. doi: 10.1002/sim.9090. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
6
Explainable machine learning can outperform Cox regression predictions and provide insights in breast cancer survival.可解释的机器学习可以优于 Cox 回归预测,并提供乳腺癌生存的见解。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 26;11(1):6968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86327-7.
7
Survival analysis-part 2: Cox proportional hazards model.生存分析 - 第2部分:Cox比例风险模型。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;37(2):229-233. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01108-7. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Using Bayesian networks to clarify interpretation of exposure-response regression coefficients: blood lead-mortality association as an example.运用贝叶斯网络厘清暴露-反应回归系数的解读:以血铅-死亡率关联为例。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020 Aug;50(7):539-550. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1787329. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Survival Analysis and Interpretation of Time-to-Event Data: The Tortoise and the Hare.生存分析与事件时间数据解读:龟兔赛跑。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Sep;127(3):792-798. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003653.
10
An Assessment of the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for Epidemiologic Studies.Cox 比例风险回归模型在流行病学研究中的评估。
Risk Anal. 2018 Apr;38(4):777-794. doi: 10.1111/risa.12865. Epub 2017 Nov 23.