Xu Yongming, Wu Junzhen, Jiang Qingqing, Lv Yingying, Zhou Jin, Wang Zhiyu, Zhao Hui, Du Dongping
Department of Pain Management Center, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 21;18:293-303. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S500717. eCollection 2025.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of chemotherapy and it is currently intractable We compared the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) against non-TEAS groups and investigated the variables that predict effective relief of upper extremity pain in cancer survivors with CIPN.
We retrospectively collected data of cancer survivors who developed CIPN between May 2017 to March 2022. All eligible CIPN patients were divided into TEAS group (received TEAS) and non-TEAS group (did not receive TEAS) in our department. A 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline features. The change of numerical rating scale (NRS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2), and sympathetic skin response (SSR) parameters are all assessed after treatment. The procedure was considered a clinically effective relief if the patients' NRS scores were reduced by 50% or more, and overall patients with effective relief were all counted after treatment. Furthermore, a multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to evaluate the predictors of effective relief following CIPN treatment.
A total of 102 cancer survivors with CIPN were analyzed after PSM (51 in each group). The change of NRS, SF-MPQ-2, SSR latency and SSR amplitude in TEAS group were significantly higher than those in non-TEAS group at 3 weeks after therapy (all <0.01). In addition, the effective relief rate was significantly higher in TEAS group than in non-TEAS group (=0.026). Multivariate logistic regression on the total study cohort showed that TEAS group (OR 2.783, P = 0.025) and the baseline SSR amplitude of the upper extremity <1265 µV (OR 12.191, P = 0.000) were independent predictive factors for the clinical efficacy.
TEAS significantly decreased the severity of CIPN. TEAS group and baseline SSR amplitude of the upper extremity <1265 µV were the independent predictive factors for the clinical efficacy after treatment.
化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是化疗常见的副作用,目前难以治疗。我们比较了经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)与非TEAS组的疗效,并研究了预测CIPN癌症幸存者上肢疼痛有效缓解的变量。
我们回顾性收集了2017年5月至2022年3月期间发生CIPN的癌症幸存者的数据。所有符合条件的CIPN患者在我科被分为TEAS组(接受TEAS治疗)和非TEAS组(未接受TEAS治疗)。采用1:1比例的倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡基线特征。治疗后评估数字评分量表(NRS)、简明麦吉尔疼痛问卷-2(SF-MPQ-2)和交感皮肤反应(SSR)参数的变化。如果患者的NRS评分降低50%或更多,则该过程被认为是临床有效缓解,治疗后统计所有有效缓解的患者。此外,采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估CIPN治疗后有效缓解的预测因素。
PSM后共分析了102例CIPN癌症幸存者(每组51例)。治疗3周后,TEAS组的NRS、SF-MPQ-2、SSR潜伏期和SSR波幅变化均显著高于非TEAS组(均P<0.01)。此外,TEAS组的有效缓解率显著高于非TEAS组(P=0.026)。对整个研究队列进行多变量逻辑回归分析显示,TEAS组(OR 2.783,P=0.025)和上肢基线SSR波幅<1265µV(OR 12.191,P=0.000)是临床疗效的独立预测因素。
TEAS显著降低了CIPN的严重程度。TEAS组和上肢基线SSR波幅<1265µV是治疗后临床疗效的独立预测因素。