DeSerisy Mariah, Cohen Jacob W, Yang Huiyu, Ramphal Bruce, Greenwood Paige, Mehta Kahini, Milham Michael P, Satterthwaite Theodore D, Pagliaccio David, Margolis Amy E
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Nov 20;5(2):100420. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100420. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Irritability affects up to 20% of youth and is a primary reason for referral to pediatric mental health clinics. Irritability is thought to be associated with disruptions in processing of reward, threat, and cognitive control; however, empirical study of these associations at both the behavioral and neural level have yielded equivocal findings that may be driven by small sample sizes and differences in study design. Associations between irritability and brain connectivity between cognitive control and reward- or threat-processing circuits remain understudied. Furthermore, better inhibitory control has been linked to lower irritability and differential neural functioning among irritable youth, suggesting that good inhibitory control may serve as a protective factor.
We hypothesized that higher irritability scores would be associated with less positive (or negative) connectivity between cognitive control and threat-processing circuits and between cognitive control and reward-processing circuits in the Healthy Brain Network dataset (release 10.0; = 4135). We also hypothesized that these associations would be moderated by inhibitory control such that weaker associations between irritability and connectivity would be detected in youths with better than with worse inhibitory control. Regression models were used to test whether associations between irritability and between-network connectivity were moderated by inhibitory control.
Counter to our hypothesis, we detected higher irritability associated with reduced connectivity between threat- and reward-processing and cognitive control networks only in 5- to 9-year-old boys. Inhibitory control did not moderate associations of irritability with between-network connectivity.
Exploratory findings indicate that reduced between-network connectivity may underlie difficulty regulating negative emotions, leading to greater irritability.
易怒情绪影响着高达20%的青少年,是他们被转介到儿童心理健康诊所的主要原因。易怒情绪被认为与奖励、威胁和认知控制加工过程的紊乱有关;然而,在行为和神经层面上对这些关联的实证研究结果并不明确,这可能是由于样本量小和研究设计差异所致。易怒情绪与认知控制和奖励或威胁加工回路之间的大脑连通性之间的关联仍未得到充分研究。此外,更好的抑制控制与较低的易怒情绪以及易怒青少年的不同神经功能有关,这表明良好的抑制控制可能是一种保护因素。
我们假设,在健康大脑网络数据集(版本10.0;n = 4135)中,易怒得分越高,认知控制与威胁加工回路之间以及认知控制与奖励加工回路之间的正向(或负向)连通性就越低。我们还假设,这些关联将受到抑制控制的调节,因此在抑制控制较好的青少年中,易怒情绪与连通性之间的关联会比抑制控制较差的青少年中更弱。回归模型用于检验易怒情绪与网络间连通性之间的关联是否受到抑制控制的调节。
与我们的假设相反,我们仅在5至9岁的男孩中发现,易怒程度越高,威胁和奖励加工网络与认知控制网络之间的连通性越低。抑制控制并未调节易怒情绪与网络间连通性的关联。
探索性研究结果表明,网络间连通性降低可能是调节负面情绪困难的基础,进而导致易怒情绪加剧。