Li Hui-Juan, Zhou Yue-Ying, Yu He-He, Jiang Jian, Cai Yu-Wei
Department of Infectious Diseases, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Jan 22;20:57-68. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S493887. eCollection 2025.
To understand the current status and analyse the factors influencing frailty in older adults patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
This retrospective case-control study included 204 older adults patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. The enrolled patients were divided into a frailty group (n = 101) and a non-frailty group (n = 103). The study further collected and compared the data of various scores.
The total frailty score among the patients ranged from 0 to 15 points, with an average score of 5.23 ± 2.31 points. The total social support score ranged from 15 to 47 points, with an average of 33.43 ± 6.11 points. The physical function level scores ranged from 10 to 100 points, with an average of 84.58 ± 14.48 points. Additionally, univariate analysis showed significant differences between the groups in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), duration of disease, types of long-term medication and the number of complications and comorbidities ( < 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed negative correlations of social support ( < 0.001) and physical function ( < 0.001) with the overall frailty score and a positive correlation of depression levels ( < 0.001) with the overall frailty score. Further regression analysis indicated that being over 80 years old, having a low BMI, long-term polypharmacy and a high depression score were risk factors. High social support and physical function scores were protective factors against frailty in older adults patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
In older adults patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, the overall frailty score shows negative correlations with social support and physical function and a positive correlation with depression level.
了解老年肺结核患者衰弱的现状并分析影响因素。
本回顾性病例对照研究纳入204例老年肺结核患者。将入选患者分为衰弱组(n = 101)和非衰弱组(n = 103)。本研究进一步收集并比较了各项评分数据。
患者的衰弱总分在0至15分之间,平均分为5.23±2.31分。社会支持总分在15至47分之间,平均为33.43±6.11分。身体功能水平评分在10至100分之间,平均为84.58±14.48分。此外,单因素分析显示,两组在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、病程、长期用药类型以及并发症和合并症数量方面存在显著差异(<0.05)。相关性分析显示,社会支持(<0.001)和身体功能(<0.001)与总体衰弱评分呈负相关,抑郁水平(<0.001)与总体衰弱评分呈正相关。进一步的回归分析表明,年龄超过80岁、BMI较低、长期多种药物治疗以及抑郁评分较高是危险因素。高社会支持和身体功能评分是老年肺结核患者衰弱的保护因素。
在老年肺结核患者中,总体衰弱评分与社会支持和身体功能呈负相关,与抑郁水平呈正相关。