Pratama Yoga W, Gidden Matthew J, Greene Jenna, Zaiser Andrew, Nemet Gregory, Riahi Keywan
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Lower Austria, Austria.
Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
iScience. 2024 Dec 19;28(1):111644. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111644. eCollection 2025 Jan 17.
Cost reductions are essential for accelerating clean technology deployment. Because multiple factors influence costs, traditional one-factor learning models, solely relying on cumulative installed capacity as an explanatory variable, may oversimplify cost dynamics. In this study, we disentangle learning and economies of scale effects at unit and project levels and introduce a knowledge gap concept to quantify rapid technological change's impact on costs. Our results show that a substantial proportion of cost declines in several technologies is attributable to economies of scale rather than learning processes. Thus, relying on one-factor learning may underestimate cost declines during upscaling periods for technologies with strong economies of scale effects and overestimate reductions for those approaching maximum size. Notably, the knowledge gap concept can endogenously capture how rapidly technology sizes can evolve through learning. These insights can improve decision-making and highlight the benefits of separating learning and economies of scale effects to estimate technology costs.
成本降低对于加速清洁技术的部署至关重要。由于多种因素影响成本,传统的单因素学习模型仅将累计装机容量作为解释变量,可能会过度简化成本动态。在本研究中,我们在单位和项目层面厘清了学习效应和规模经济效应,并引入知识差距概念来量化快速技术变革对成本的影响。我们的结果表明,几种技术中相当一部分的成本下降归因于规模经济而非学习过程。因此,对于具有强大规模经济效应的技术,依赖单因素学习可能会低估扩大规模期间的成本下降,而对于接近最大规模的技术则会高估成本下降。值得注意的是,知识差距概念可以内生地捕捉技术规模通过学习可以多快地演变。这些见解可以改善决策,并凸显区分学习效应和规模经济效应以估算技术成本的好处。