Babbs Gray, Wolfe Hill Landon, Ulrich Michael R, Raifman Julia, Lipson Sarah Ketchen
Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health.
Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health.
Stigma Health. 2024 Nov;9(4):601-604. doi: 10.1037/sah0000459. Epub 2023 May 18.
"Religious conscience" or "healthcare denial" policies allow healthcare providers and institutions to refuse to provide services in the name of religious freedom. Denial policies are a form of structural stigma that could impede access to healthcare for sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations, particularly SGM young adults. This study describes SGM university students' response to policies permitting healthcare providers to deny care based on their religious beliefs. Data were obtained from 8,322 SGM students at 38 colleges and universities who participated in the spring 2020 Healthy Minds Study. Descriptive statistics are reported for the level of distress due to the denial policies and likelihood to avoid identity disclosure. Over 90% of SGM students report distress knowing about denial policies (sexual minority: 6.95/10; gender minority: 8.05/10). Students also reported similarly high distress imagining that they had been denied care (sexual minority: 8.05/10; gender minority: 8.57/10). The majority of sexual (69.2%) and gender minority (82.2%) students agreed the policy would make them less likely to disclose their identity to a new provider. Experiencing, or even anticipating, discrimination in healthcare settings through denial policies has negative impacts on the health of SGM populations and has the potential to exacerbate existing mental health disparities for SGM young adults.
“宗教良知”或“医疗保健拒绝”政策允许医疗保健提供者和机构以宗教自由的名义拒绝提供服务。拒绝政策是一种结构性污名化形式,可能会阻碍性取向和性别认同少数群体(SGM),尤其是SGM青年获得医疗保健服务。本研究描述了SGM大学生对允许医疗保健提供者基于宗教信仰拒绝治疗的政策的反应。数据来自38所高校的8322名SGM学生,他们参与了2020年春季的“健康心灵研究”。报告了因拒绝政策导致的痛苦程度以及避免身份披露可能性的描述性统计数据。超过90%的SGM学生表示,了解拒绝政策会让他们感到痛苦(性取向少数群体:6.95/10;性别认同少数群体:8.05/10)。学生们还表示,想象自己被拒绝治疗时也有同样高的痛苦感(性取向少数群体:8.05/10;性别认同少数群体:8.57/10)。大多数性取向少数群体(69.2%)和性别认同少数群体(82.2%)的学生认为,该政策会让他们不太可能向新的医疗保健提供者透露自己的身份。通过拒绝政策在医疗保健环境中经历甚至预期会受到歧视,对SGM人群的健康有负面影响,并有可能加剧SGM青年现有的心理健康差距。