Maya María Angélica, Ortiz Celeny, Averhoff Francisco, Carabali Mabel, Pérez-Restrepo Laura S, Ciuoderis-Aponte Karl, Davila Ana Isabel, Bastidas Diego, Buitrago Seti, Cloherty Gavin A, Berg Michael G, Landy Alan, Hernandez-Ortiz Juan P, Rebolledo Paulina A, Osorio Jorge E
GHI One Health Colombia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
Departmental Health Secretariat of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Front Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 10;4:1519378. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1519378. eCollection 2024.
Surveillance of acute respiratory infection (ARI) informs vaccination, preventive, and management decisions. In many countries, immunofluorescence is the cornerstone for ARI surveillance. We aimed to determine the effect of adding multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) to conventional surveillance in ARI.
Respiratory samples from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) were tested by a conventional approach [direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and SARS-CoV-2 PCR, and a subset of samples underwent routine testing]. Negative specimens were tested by multiplex PCR (mPCR), and remain negative samples were sequenced. Descriptive, multivariable regression analyses were conducted.
Between March and June 2022, 299 patients were enrolled. Pathogens were detected in 43.8% of samples (131/299) tested by the conventional approach. Of the 168 negatives after the conventional approach, 157 (93.4%) were positive by mPCR, increasing the detection rate to 96.3% (288/299). With the conventional approach, the most frequent pathogen was respiratory syncytial virus (50.3%, 66/131), whereas with mPCR it was (37.5%, 63/168). mPCR significantly improved pathogen detection in ARI surveillance (Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios 4.22 95% IC 4.22-5.85).
Adding mPCR to respiratory surveillance conventionally based on DIF significantly enhanced virus and bacteria detection. mPCR should be considered for routine ARI surveillance.
急性呼吸道感染(ARI)监测为疫苗接种、预防和管理决策提供依据。在许多国家,免疫荧光是ARI监测的基石。我们旨在确定在ARI常规监测中添加多重聚合酶链反应(mPCR)的效果。
采用传统方法[直接免疫荧光(DIF)和SARS-CoV-2 PCR,部分样本进行常规检测]对流感样疾病(ILI)和严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)患者的呼吸道样本进行检测。对阴性标本进行多重PCR(mPCR)检测,对仍为阴性的样本进行测序。进行描述性和多变量回归分析。
2022年3月至6月,共纳入299例患者。采用传统方法检测的样本中,43.8%(131/299)检测到病原体。在传统方法检测为阴性的168份样本中,157份(93.4%)经mPCR检测为阳性,使检测率提高到96.3%(288/299)。采用传统方法时,最常见的病原体是呼吸道合胞病毒(50.3%,66/131),而采用mPCR时是[具体病原体未给出](37.5%,63/168)。mPCR显著提高了ARI监测中病原体的检测率(调整发病率比值4.22,95%置信区间4.22 - 5.85)。
在基于DIF的传统呼吸道监测中添加mPCR可显著提高病毒和细菌的检测率。应考虑将mPCR用于ARI常规监测。