• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据说话者性别认同的声学测量:差异及与嗓音满意度的相关性

Acoustic Measures According to Speaker Gender Identity: Differences and Correlation With Vocal Satisfaction.

作者信息

Martinho Diego Henrique da Cruz, Constantini Ana Carolina

机构信息

Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Voice. 2025 Jan 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.12.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.12.016
PMID:39870558
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze acoustic measures of speech and vowel samples from individuals of different genders and to correlate these acoustic measures with vocal satisfaction. This study aims to provide additional data on acoustic measures, serving as references for clinicians while emphasizing the importance of moving beyond cisgender norms. Additionally, it addresses a gap in the Brazilian context by exploring correlations between acoustic measures and self-perceived vocal satisfaction across diverse gender groups.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. Speech segments and sustained vowel emissions from 47 individuals (11 cisgender women-CW, 11 transgender women-TW, 11 cisgender men-CM, seven transgender men-TM, and seven non-binary individuals-NB) were recorded, and 14 acoustic measures of noise, perturbation, spectral, and cepstral parameters were extracted. Vocal satisfaction was measured using a visual analog scale. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis, Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner, and Spearman correlation tests, considering P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in various acoustic measures, such as the average fundamental frequency (f) between CW and CM (P < 0.001), TM (P = 0.015), and TW (P = 0.050); minimum f between CW and CM (P = 0.002) and TW (P = 0.050); Jitter between CW and CM (P = 0.013); H1-H2 between CW and CM (P = 0.002); Shimmer between CW and CM (P = 0.046); Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) SCORE between CW and CM (P = 0.024); median f in speech between CW and CM (P < 0.001), TM (P = 0.009), and TW (P = 0.011); minimum f in speech between CW and CM (P = 0.014) and TW (P = 0.031); and maximum f in speech between CW and TW (P = 0.050). The measures that correlated with vocal satisfaction were strong positive correlation for spectral emphasis in CW (R = 0.608; P = 0.047) and noise-to-harmonic ratio in TW (R = 0.724; P = 0.012); very strong positive correlation for smoothed cepstral peak prominence in TM (R = 0.847; P = 0.016); and strong negative correlation for coefficient of variation of intensity in NB (R = -0.775; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Acoustic measures differ according to the speaker's gender in the studied sample. Significant differences were observed in fundamental frequency between CM and cisgender and TW, as well as between cisgender and TW. Differences in fundamental frequency, Jitter, Shimmer, the difference between the first two harmonics, and the were identified across gender groups. The measures correlated with vocal satisfaction differed among the groups. However, these correlations should be interpreted cautiously, as they suggest a relationship but do not imply causation, and their clinical significance requires further investigation.

摘要

目的

分析不同性别人群的语音和元音样本的声学特征,并将这些声学特征与嗓音满意度相关联。本研究旨在提供关于声学特征的更多数据,为临床医生提供参考,同时强调超越顺性别规范的重要性。此外,通过探索不同性别群体中声学特征与自我感知的嗓音满意度之间的相关性,填补巴西背景下的空白。

方法

横断面研究。记录了47名个体(11名顺性别女性-CW、11名跨性别女性-TW、11名顺性别男性-CM、7名跨性别男性-TM和7名非二元性别个体-NB)的语音片段和持续元音发音,并提取了14项关于噪声、微扰、频谱和倒谱参数的声学特征。使用视觉模拟量表测量嗓音满意度。采用Kruskal-Wallis、Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner和Spearman相关性检验进行描述性和推断性分析,P<0.05为有统计学意义。

结果

在各种声学特征方面观察到显著差异,如CW与CM之间的平均基频(f)(P<0.001)、TM(P=0.015)和TW(P=0.050);CW与CM之间的最低f(P=0.002)和TW(P=0.050);CW与CM之间的抖动(P=0.013);CW与CM之间的H1-H2(P=0.002);CW与CM之间的闪烁(P=0.046);CW与CM之间的声学呼吸音指数(ABI)评分(P=0.024);CW与CM之间的语音中值f(P<0.001)、TM(P=0.009)和TW(P=0.011);CW与CM之间语音中的最低f(P=0.014)和TW(P=0.031);CW与TW之间语音中的最高f(P=0.050)。与嗓音满意度相关的指标为:CW中频谱强调的强正相关(R=0.608;P=0.047)和TW中噪声与谐波比值的强正相关(R=0.724;P=0.012);TM中平滑倒谱峰值突出度的非常强正相关(R=0.847;P=0.016);NB中强度变异系数的强负相关(R=-0.775;P=0.041)。

结论

在所研究的样本中,声学特征因说话者的性别而异。在CM与顺性别和TW之间以及顺性别和TW之间的基频上观察到显著差异。在不同性别群体中确定了基频、抖动、闪烁、前两个谐波之间的差异以及其他方面的差异。与嗓音满意度相关的指标在不同群体中有所不同。然而,这些相关性应谨慎解释,因为它们表明了一种关系,但并不意味着因果关系,其临床意义需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Acoustic Measures According to Speaker Gender Identity: Differences and Correlation With Vocal Satisfaction.根据说话者性别认同的声学测量:差异及与嗓音满意度的相关性
J Voice. 2025 Jan 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.12.016.
2
Can acoustic measurements predict gender perception in the voice?声学测量能否预测语音中的性别感知?
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0310794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310794. eCollection 2024.
3
Auditory-Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis of Gender Expression in the Voice.嗓音中性别表达的听觉感知评估与声学分析
J Voice. 2024 Feb 8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.12.024.
4
Acoustic Analysis of Mandarin-Speaking Transgender Women.讲普通话的跨性别女性的声学分析。
J Voice. 2024 Sep 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.037.
5
Perceptual-Auditory and Acoustic Analysis of Breathiness in Cis and Transgender Men and Women.顺性别和跨性别男性与女性呼吸声的感知听觉与声学分析。
J Voice. 2024 Mar 30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.02.015.
6
Prosodic Differences in the Voices of Transgender and Cisgender Women: Self-Perception of Voice - An Auditory and Acoustic Analysis.跨性别女性和 cisgender 女性声音的韵律差异:对声音的自我感知 - 听觉和声学分析。
J Voice. 2024 Jul;38(4):844-857. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.12.020. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
7
Is size in the eye of the beholder? Visual estimation of penis size among transgender and cisgender people and implications for genital gender-affirming surgery and sexual medicine.旁观者眼中的大小?跨性别者和顺性别者对阴茎大小的视觉估计,以及对生殖器性别肯定手术和性医学的影响。
J Sex Med. 2024 Jan 30;21(2):175-180. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad147.
8
Vocal Markers in the Gender Perception of Trans Women and Trans Men.跨性别女性和跨性别男性性别认知中的嗓音标志物
J Voice. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.002.
9
An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.不同 Praat 版本的评估,这些版本的声学测量由 VoiceEvalU8 自动分析,由两位评分者手动分析。
J Voice. 2023 Jan;37(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
Differences and Reliability of Linear and Nonlinear Acoustic Measures as a Function of Vocal Intensity in Individuals With Voice Disorders.嗓音障碍患者线性和非线性声学测量在不同声强下的差异及可靠性。
J Voice. 2023 Sep;37(5):663-681. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9.