Suppr超能文献

全国范围内指南的实施:从指南制定组织角度对障碍和促进因素的定性研究

Nationwide guideline implementation: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators from the perspective of guideline organizations.

作者信息

Thoonsen Andrea C, Gans Anika, Broeders Toby T, van Beusekom Ilse, Delnoij Diana M J, de Bruijne Martine C, Merten Hanneke

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, NL-1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Zorginstituut Nederland, Department of Care, Willem Dudokhof 1, NL-1112 ZA, Diemen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12270-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the number of Dutch guidelines is growing, their uptake and impact in clinical practice lag behind. Dutch guideline organizations, including guideline developers, governmental agencies, health insurers and other national organizations, play a crucial role in developing, authorizing and/or supporting the use of guidelines. They influence end users' awareness, accessibility, understanding, acceptability and applicability of guidelines. In this study, we explored the barriers and facilitators that representatives of guideline organizations perceive in nationwide guideline implementation.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 35 representatives of 24 different guideline organizations. We employed framework analysis, using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and thematic analysis to guide our data analysis and synthesis.

RESULTS

We found 45 different implementation barriers and 35 implementation facilitators. We identified seven overarching themes of interrelated barriers and facilitators that extended across the stakeholders involved and domains within the updated CFIR. These included 1) healthcare demand and resource availability, 2) implementation knowledge and expertise, 3) guideline characteristics: representation, evidence base and design, 4) partnerships and collaboration, 5) characteristics of guideline implementation planning, execution and evaluation strategies, 6) characteristics of healthcare professionals: need, capability, opportunity and motivation, and 7) legal and regulatory compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

We obtained valuable insights into the complex dynamics of barriers and facilitators perceived by guideline organizations in nationwide guideline implementation. Our findings help explain why healthcare professionals and healthcare facilities may (not), slowly or inconsistently adhere to guideline recommendations in practice. The identified barriers and facilitators provide guidance for policymakers to re-evaluate and improve nationwide quality and guideline implementation policies, to eventually improve clinical practice and health outcomes for patients.

摘要

背景

尽管荷兰指南的数量在不断增加,但其在临床实践中的应用和影响却滞后。包括指南制定者、政府机构、健康保险公司和其他国家组织在内的荷兰指南组织在制定、授权和/或支持指南的使用方面发挥着关键作用。它们影响终端用户对指南的认知、获取、理解、接受和适用性。在本研究中,我们探讨了指南组织代表在全国范围内实施指南时所感知到的障碍和促进因素。

方法

在这项定性研究中,我们对24个不同指南组织的35名代表进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用框架分析,使用更新后的实施研究综合框架(CFIR),并进行主题分析来指导我们的数据分析和综合。

结果

我们发现了45个不同的实施障碍和35个实施促进因素。我们确定了七个相互关联的障碍和促进因素的总体主题,这些主题贯穿于相关利益者以及更新后的CFIR中的各个领域。其中包括1)医疗保健需求和资源可用性,2)实施知识和专业技能,3)指南特征:代表性、证据基础和设计,4)伙伴关系与合作,5)指南实施规划、执行和评估策略的特征,6)医疗保健专业人员的特征:需求、能力、机会和动机,以及7)法律法规合规性。

结论

我们对指南组织在全国范围内实施指南时所感知到的障碍和促进因素的复杂动态有了宝贵的见解。我们的研究结果有助于解释为什么医疗保健专业人员和医疗保健机构在实践中可能(不)、缓慢或不一致地遵循指南建议。所确定的障碍和促进因素为政策制定者重新评估和改进全国性的质量和指南实施政策提供了指导,最终改善患者的临床实践和健康结果。

相似文献

2
The role of guideline organizations in nationwide guideline implementation: a qualitative study.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 23;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01253-0.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Factors affecting speech pathologists' implementation of stroke management guidelines: a thematic analysis.
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):674-85. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.932444. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of guideline organizations in nationwide guideline implementation: a qualitative study.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 23;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01253-0.
3
Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
4
Using framework analysis methods for qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 164.
Med Teach. 2024 May;46(5):603-610. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2259073. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
7
Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review.
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 27;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01247-y.
8
[Guidelines in historical perspective].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2022 Oct 20;166:D6956.
10
Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 23;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01223-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验