Hajak Vivien, Grimm Simone, Gruszczyńska Ewa, Kroemeke Aleksandra, Józefacka Natalia, Warner Lisa Marie
Department of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Str. 50, Berlin, 14197, Germany.
SWPS University, Institute of Psychology, Health & Coping Research Group, Warsaw, Poland.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 27;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02319-y.
A growing body of research suggests that the provision of social support can have benefits not only for the recipients but also for the provider. Although initial evidence for affective, self-evaluative and physiological outcomes has been established, the beneficial effects of support provision do not occur consistently across all support interactions, and some interactions may even have detrimental effects on providers. The aim of our experimental paradigm is to enable researchers to test the conditions under which the provision of social support to dyadic partners affects affective, self-evaluative, physiological, and relationship outcomes for the provider. In line with self-determination theory, it is proposed that the provision of support is only beneficial to the provider if it satisfies the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness. The paradigm allows for the manipulation of the provider's levels of competence (feedback on the effectiveness of their support to the other person) and relatedness (feedback on the alleged level of relatedness perceived by the partner person following the provision of support).
A priori power analyses resulted in a planned sample size of 250 participants randomized to four conditions: 1) no support provision, 2) support provision without feedback, 3) support provision with feedback on competence, 4) support provision with feedback on relatedness. Primary outcomes are immediate physiological (saliva cortisol, heart rate, heart rate variability, blood pressure), affective (positive and negative affect, anxiety), self-evaluative (e.g., self-esteem) and relationship outcomes. Generalized linear models will be used to compare the four conditions.
In a controlled laboratory experiment, this new experimental paradigm manipulates the conditions under which social support is provided. Insights into the conditions under which the provision of social support is detrimental or beneficial to the provider can inform the development of preventive and interventional approaches across a range of life domains, motivational and developmental research across the lifespan (e.g. prevention of care-giver burnout), and applied clinical contexts (e.g. therapeutic interventions).
Pre-registration (2023-11-10): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8SPZW , retrospective registration with more details (2024-10-23): https://www.drks.de/DRKS00034287.
越来越多的研究表明,提供社会支持不仅对接受者有益,对提供者也有好处。尽管已经确立了关于情感、自我评估和生理结果的初步证据,但支持提供的有益效果并非在所有支持互动中都一致出现,有些互动甚至可能对提供者产生不利影响。我们实验范式的目的是使研究人员能够测试向二元伙伴提供社会支持会在何种条件下影响提供者的情感、自我评估、生理和关系结果。根据自我决定理论,有人提出,只有当提供支持满足自主、能力和关联性这三种基本心理需求时,才对提供者有益。该范式允许操纵提供者的能力水平(关于他们对他人支持有效性的反馈)和关联性水平(关于伙伴在接受支持后所感知的所谓关联程度的反馈)。
先验功效分析得出计划样本量为250名参与者,随机分为四种条件:1)不提供支持;2)提供支持但无反馈;3)提供支持并给予能力反馈;4)提供支持并给予关联性反馈。主要结果是即时生理指标(唾液皮质醇、心率、心率变异性、血压)、情感指标(积极和消极情绪、焦虑)、自我评估指标(如自尊)和关系指标。将使用广义线性模型来比较这四种条件。
在一项对照实验室实验中,这种新的实验范式操纵了提供社会支持的条件。深入了解社会支持的提供对提供者有害或有益的条件,可以为一系列生活领域的预防和干预方法的发展、整个生命周期的动机和发展研究(如预防照顾者倦怠)以及应用临床环境(如治疗干预)提供信息。
预注册(2023年11月10日):https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8SPZW ,更详细的追溯注册(2024年10月23日):https://www.drks.de/DRKS00034287 。