• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

满足家长的健康素养需求——儿童癫痫背景下三步干预措施的设计与可行性测试

Meeting Parents' Health Literacy Needs-Designing and Feasibility Testing of a Three-Step Intervention in the Childhood Epilepsy Context.

作者信息

Tschamper Merete K, Wahl Astrid K, Jakobsen Rita, Larsen Marie H

机构信息

Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Division of Clinical Neuroscience, The National Centre for Epilepsy, Full Member of European Network on Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17652.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.17652
PMID:39871646
Abstract

AIMS

(1) To codesign a health literacy intervention within a specialist healthcare setting to help the parents of children with epilepsy access, comprehend, use and communicate information and (2) to assess the intervention's feasibility by exploring stakeholders' perspectives on its usefulness, ease of use of trial methods and contextual factors impacting its execution.

DESIGN

A codesign participatory approach followed by a feasibility approach inspired by the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access to Health Services (Ophelia) process for health literacy intervention development.

METHODS

(1) The codesign approach included workshops with (a) multidisciplinary personnel (n = 9) and (b) parents (n = 12), along with (c) an interview with one regional epilepsy specialist nurse (n = 1). The participants discussed parents' health literacy needs on the basis of vignettes and brainstormed service improvements. A three-step intervention was subsequently designed. (2) The intervention's feasibility was assessed via interviews with six parents (n = 6), a focus group interview with study nurses, a short doctors survey and a log of time spent testing the intervention.

RESULTS

(1) The parents of first-time admitted children to a specialist epilepsy hospital were targeted for the intervention. Nurse-parent consultations were central to the intervention, activating parents in codeveloping and executing a tailored education plan. (2) Feasibility: parents (n = 6) experienced consultations and education plans that were beneficial for enhancing their self-efficacy in managing the child's condition. The study nurses (n = 3) acknowledged positive outcomes in streamlining patient education but felt that their training on the intervention methods was insufficient. Both parents and nurses identified limited personnel resources as a significant barrier to executing the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The codesigned intervention engaged nurses and parents in HL development despite system barriers. The parents experience enhanced self-efficacy in managing their child's condition. However, needs refinements and further feasibility tests are needed before future implementation.

REPORTING METHOD

The Consort Statement 2010 extension for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies was used to ensure the methodological quality of the study. A Consort Statement 2010 checklist is provided as an additional file.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The collaboration of parents within the target group, the providers involved and the project's steering committee was crucial in codesigning and evaluating this three-step intervention. Parents and multidisciplinary providers actively contributed through workshops, interviews and in discussion meetings. The study nurses testing the intervention played a key role in defining the documentation process for the codeveloped education plan.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL CARE

This three-step health literacy intervention can positively impact parents' self-efficacy in managing their child's condition. Enhancing nurses' communication skills is essential for improving parents' health literacy, making it crucial to allocate resources for such training. The intervention content and strategies to meet parents' health literacy needs require refinement, with more provider involvement to better adapt it to the context. Future studies should focus on further feasibility testing by considering a more flexible time frame.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/fg9c7/.

摘要

目的

(1)在专科医疗环境中共同设计一项健康素养干预措施,以帮助癫痫患儿的家长获取、理解、使用和交流信息;(2)通过探索利益相关者对其有用性、试验方法易用性以及影响其实施的背景因素的看法,评估该干预措施的可行性。

设计

采用共同设计参与式方法,随后是受优化健康素养与健康服务获取(Ophelia)健康素养干预开发流程启发的可行性方法。

方法

(1)共同设计方法包括与(a)多学科人员(n = 9)、(b)家长(n = 12)举办研讨会,以及(c)对一名地区癫痫专科护士进行访谈(n = 1)。参与者基于案例讨论家长的健康素养需求,并就服务改进进行头脑风暴。随后设计了一个三步干预措施。(2)通过对六名家长进行访谈(n = 6)、对研究护士进行焦点小组访谈、对医生进行简短调查以及记录测试干预措施所花费的时间,评估干预措施的可行性。

结果

(1)该干预措施的目标对象是首次入住专科癫痫医院的患儿家长。护士 - 家长咨询是干预措施的核心,促使家长共同制定并执行量身定制的教育计划。(2)可行性:六名家长体验到咨询和教育计划有助于提高他们管理孩子病情的自我效能感。三名研究护士承认在简化患者教育方面取得了积极成果,但认为他们对干预方法的培训不足。家长和护士都认为人员资源有限是实施干预措施的重大障碍。

结论

尽管存在系统障碍,但共同设计的干预措施让护士和家长参与到健康素养的发展中。家长在管理孩子病情方面的自我效能感有所增强。然而,在未来实施之前需要进行改进和进一步的可行性测试。

报告方法

使用2010年《CONSORT声明》扩展版来报告非随机试点和可行性研究,以确保研究的方法学质量。提供了一份2010年《CONSORT声明》清单作为补充文件。

患者或公众贡献

目标群体中的家长、相关提供者以及项目指导委员会之间的合作对于共同设计和评估这一三步干预措施至关重要。家长和多学科提供者通过研讨会、访谈和讨论会议积极做出贡献。测试干预措施的研究护士在确定共同制定的教育计划的记录流程方面发挥了关键作用。

对专业护理的启示

这一三步健康素养干预措施可对家长管理孩子病情的自我效能感产生积极影响。提高护士的沟通技巧对于提高家长的健康素养至关重要,因此为这种培训分配资源至关重要。满足家长健康素养需求的干预内容和策略需要改进,需要更多提供者参与以更好地使其适应实际情况。未来的研究应通过考虑更灵活的时间框架来专注于进一步的可行性测试。

试验注册

开放科学框架:https://osf.io/fg9c7/

相似文献

1
Meeting Parents' Health Literacy Needs-Designing and Feasibility Testing of a Three-Step Intervention in the Childhood Epilepsy Context.满足家长的健康素养需求——儿童癫痫背景下三步干预措施的设计与可行性测试
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17652.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Developing and maintaining health literacy: A continuous emotional, cognitive, and social process for parents of children with epilepsy-A qualitative study.发展和维护健康素养:癫痫患儿父母的持续情感、认知和社会过程——一项定性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 May;142:109222. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109222. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
9
Cue-based versus scheduled feeding for preterm infants transitioning from tube to oral feeding: the Cubs mixed-methods feasibility study.基于线索的喂养与计划性喂养在早产儿经管饲向口服喂养过渡中的比较:Cubs 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(74):1-146. doi: 10.3310/hta25740.
10
How to co-design a health literacy-informed intervention based on a needs assessment study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.如何基于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的需求评估研究共同设计一项以健康素养为导向的干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e063022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063022.