Guillemot Jonathan R, Abraham John W, Tinker Anthea
Escuela de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Social and Desafíos Globales, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Institute of Gerontology, Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 13;11:1454150. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1454150. eCollection 2024.
Osteoporosis is a significant geriatric condition, considering its impact on fracture-related morbidity and mortality, particularly among older women. The interplay of clinical evidence, diagnostic tools availability, and broader societal attitudes toward aging and treatment efficacy affect medical attitude and prescribing behaviors. Using the example of osteoporosis in France and England, the study aims to unravel the intricacies of medical decision-making in geriatric care, offering insights into the evolving landscape of healthcare policy and practice, which in turn can help reduce futile biomedical research.
We employed documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews. Documentary analysis involved examining public policy documents related to osteoporosis management in England and France to identify trends in regulatory policies influencing prescribing practices. Semi-structured interviews with physicians explored prescriber decision-making processes, treatment initiation, and compliance management, providing insights into clinical practice complexities.
The policy analysis uncovered 157 documents between 2015 and 2016, updated in 2018, revealing distinct policy clusters and outliers shaping osteoporosis management in England and France. Therapeutic indications generally mirrored marketing authorizations. Reimbursable therapeutic indications in France showed fluctuating availability, reflecting changes in policy priorities and patient demographics. Clinical guidelines evolved to encompass diverse osteoporosis types and treatment options, guided by evidence-based recommendations and healthcare system considerations. Trust dynamics between physicians, pharmaceutical companies, and health authorities influenced prescribing trends, with variations in reliance on standardized protocols and collaborative decision-making observed between England and France.
Understanding trends in osteoporosis drug prescribing is crucial for optimizing healthcare policy and practice. Our study highlights the complex factors influencing prescribing patterns in England and France, emphasizing the role of trust in shaping physician behaviors. By addressing barriers to treatment uptake and enhancing patient outcomes, targeted interventions can be developed to reduce futile biomedical research and improve healthcare resource allocation.
考虑到骨质疏松症对骨折相关发病率和死亡率的影响,尤其是在老年女性中,它是一种重要的老年疾病。临床证据、诊断工具的可用性以及社会对衰老和治疗效果的更广泛态度之间的相互作用,会影响医疗态度和处方行为。本研究以法国和英国的骨质疏松症为例,旨在揭示老年护理中医疗决策的复杂性,深入了解医疗保健政策和实践的演变格局,进而有助于减少徒劳的生物医学研究。
我们采用了文献分析和半结构化访谈。文献分析包括审查与英国和法国骨质疏松症管理相关的公共政策文件,以确定影响处方实践的监管政策趋势。对医生进行半结构化访谈,探讨处方者的决策过程、治疗启动和依从性管理,从而深入了解临床实践的复杂性。
政策分析在2015年至2016年期间发现了157份文件,并于2018年进行了更新,揭示了塑造英国和法国骨质疏松症管理的不同政策集群和异常情况。治疗适应症通常与上市许可一致。法国可报销的治疗适应症的可用性波动较大,反映了政策重点和患者人口统计学的变化。临床指南不断发展,以涵盖各种骨质疏松症类型和治疗选择,这是基于循证建议和医疗保健系统考虑。医生、制药公司和卫生当局之间的信任动态影响了处方趋势,英国和法国在对标准化方案的依赖和共同决策方面存在差异。
了解骨质疏松症药物处方趋势对于优化医疗保健政策和实践至关重要。我们的研究强调了影响英国和法国处方模式的复杂因素,强调了信任在塑造医生行为方面的作用。通过消除治疗采用的障碍并改善患者预后,可以制定有针对性的干预措施,以减少徒劳的生物医学研究并改善医疗资源分配。