Cook David C, Olsen Matthew, Tronstad Oystein, Fraser John F, Goldsworthy Adrian, Alghafri Rashed, McKirdy Simon J, Tajouri Lotti
Harry Butler Research Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 13;4:1448913. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1448913. eCollection 2024.
Mobile phones have become essential tools for health care workers around the world, but as high touch surfaces, they can harbor microorganisms that pose infection risks to patients and staff. As their use in hospitals increases, hospital managers must introduce measures to sanitize mobile phones and reduce risks of health care-associated infections. But such measures can involve substantial costs. Our objective in this paper was to consider two mobile phone risk mitigation strategies that managers of a hypothetical hospital could implement and determine which involves the lowest cost. The first strategy required all staff to sanitize their hands after every contact with a mobile phone. The second involved the hospital investing in ultraviolet-C-based mobile phone sanitization devices that allowed staff to decontaminate their mobile phones after every use. We assessed each intervention on material and opportunity costs assuming both achieved an equivalent reduction in microbe transmission within the hospital. We found that ultraviolet-C devices were the most cost-effective intervention, with median costs of approximately AUD360 per bed per year compared to AUD965 using hand hygiene protocols. Our results imply that a 200-bed hospital could potentially save AUD1-1.4 million over 10 years by investing in germicidal ultraviolet-C phone sanitizers rather than relying solely on hand hygiene protocols.
手机已成为全球医护人员的必备工具,但作为高频接触表面,它们可能携带对患者和工作人员构成感染风险的微生物。随着手机在医院的使用增加,医院管理人员必须采取措施对手机进行消毒,以降低医疗相关感染的风险。但这些措施可能涉及高昂成本。本文的目的是考虑一家假设医院的管理人员可以实施的两种减轻手机风险的策略,并确定哪种策略成本最低。第一种策略要求所有工作人员在每次接触手机后对手部进行消毒。第二种策略是医院投资基于紫外线C的手机消毒设备,让工作人员在每次使用手机后对其进行消毒。我们在假设两种干预措施都能在医院内实现同等程度的微生物传播减少的情况下,评估了每种干预措施的物质成本和机会成本。我们发现,紫外线C设备是最具成本效益的干预措施,每张床位每年的成本中位数约为360澳元,而采用手部卫生规程的成本为965澳元。我们的结果表明,一家拥有200张床位的医院通过投资杀菌紫外线C手机消毒器,而不是仅依靠手部卫生规程,在10年内可能节省100万至140万澳元。