Lee Katie A, Uzal Antonio, Gentle Louise K, Baker Philip J, Delahay Richard J, Sévêque Anthony, Davis Robert S, Yarnell Richard W
School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Science, Brackenhurst Campus Nottingham Trent University Southwell UK.
Health and Life Sciences Building, School of Biological Sciences University of Reading Berkshire UK.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan 26;15(1):e70744. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70744. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Predicting the spatial and temporal responses of species exhibiting intraguild predation (IGP) relationships is difficult due to variation in potential interactions and environmental context. Eurasian badgers () are intraguild predators of European hedgehogs () and are implicated in their population decline via both direct predation and competition for shared food resources. Previous studies have shown spatial separation between these species and attributed this to hedgehogs experiencing a 'landscape of fear', but little is known about the potential role of differential habitat use. We estimated the density and occupancy of both species at 22 rural study sites in England and Wales, to explore whether food availability, habitat or the presence of badgers, explained hedgehog distributions. Hedgehog density varied significantly across major rural land uses, whereas badger density did not. Although both species coexisted at a regional (1 km) scale, occupancy modelling showed spatial segregation at a finer (individual camera trap) scale, associated with differential habitat use. In contrast to badgers, hedgehogs were recorded near buildings, and in areas supporting lower invertebrate biomass. This is in agreement with IGP theory, whereby IG-prey may occupy suboptimal habitat to avoid predation; however, hedgehog habitat use did not vary relative to the presence of badgers. Badger and hedgehog temporal activity showed no evidence of separation. Although these findings are consistent with hedgehogs avoiding badgers via a landscape of fear, they are also indicative of differential habitat use, highlighting the need for more holistic studies considering variation in habitat selection and food availability when investigating intraguild relationships. Future studies exploring alternative hypotheses for urban habitat selection by hedgehogs are needed to better understand how possible spatial niche partitioning may support their coexistence with badgers in some areas.
由于潜在相互作用和环境背景的差异,预测具有公会内捕食(IGP)关系的物种的时空反应具有一定难度。欧亚獾是欧洲刺猬的公会内捕食者,通过直接捕食和对共享食物资源的竞争,对刺猬种群数量的下降负有责任。先前的研究表明这两个物种在空间上相互分离,并将此归因于刺猬经历了“恐惧景观”,但对于栖息地利用差异的潜在作用却知之甚少。我们估计了英格兰和威尔士22个农村研究地点这两个物种的密度和占有率,以探究食物可利用性、栖息地或獾的存在是否能解释刺猬的分布情况。刺猬密度在主要农村土地利用类型中差异显著,而獾的密度则不然。尽管这两个物种在区域(1公里)尺度上共存,但占有率模型显示在更精细(单个相机陷阱)尺度上存在空间隔离,这与栖息地利用差异有关。与獾不同,刺猬在建筑物附近以及支持较低无脊椎动物生物量的区域被记录到。这与IGP理论相符,即IG猎物可能占据次优栖息地以避免被捕食;然而,刺猬的栖息地利用情况并未因獾的存在而有所不同。獾和刺猬的时间活动没有显示出分离的迹象。尽管这些发现与刺猬通过恐惧景观避开獾的情况一致,但也表明了栖息地利用的差异,突出了在研究公会内关系时,需要进行更全面的研究,考虑栖息地选择和食物可利用性的变化。未来需要开展研究,探索刺猬选择城市栖息地的其他假设,以更好地理解可能的空间生态位划分如何支持它们在某些地区与獾共存。