Scott Dawn Millicent, Fowler Robert, Sanglas Ariadna, Tolhurst Bryony Anne
School of Animal Rural and Environment Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell NG25 0QF, UK.
School of Life Sciences, John Maynard Smith Building, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;13(4):590. doi: 10.3390/ani13040590.
Hedgehogs occur within an urban mammal guild in the United Kingdom. This guild commonly utilizes anthropogenic food provision, which is potentially beneficial to wild animal populations, but may also bring competitors and predators into proximity, raising the question of how these species interact in urban gardens. In this study, we determined interactions between hedgehogs, foxes, badgers, and domestic cats using videos submitted via citizen science. We analyzed interactions within and between species to determine interaction type, hierarchical relationships, and effect of supplementary food presence/amount. We found that overall agonistic interactions between individuals occurred more frequently (55.4%) than neutral interactions (44.6%) and that interspecific interactions showed greater agonism (55.4%) than intraspecific ones (36%). Within intraspecific interactions, those between hedgehogs were the most agonistic (54.9%) and between badgers the least (6.7%). Species composition of the interaction affected agonism, with interactions between cats and foxes showing the highest level (76.7%). In terms of overall "wins", where access to garden resources was gained, badgers dominated cats, which were dominant or equal to foxes, which dominated hedgehogs. However, hedgehogs exhibited a greater overall proportion of wins (39.3%) relative to cats. Our findings are important in the context of the documented impact of patchy resources on urban wildlife behavior, and we show that provision of anthropogenic food can potentially result in unintended consequences. We recommend actions to reduce proximity of guild competitors in space and time to limit negative effects.
刺猬出现在英国城市哺乳动物群落中。这个群落通常利用人为提供的食物,这可能对野生动物种群有益,但也可能使竞争者和捕食者靠近,从而引发了这些物种在城市花园中如何相互作用的问题。在这项研究中,我们利用公民科学提交的视频确定了刺猬、狐狸、獾和家猫之间的相互作用。我们分析了种内和种间的相互作用,以确定相互作用类型、等级关系以及补充食物的存在/数量的影响。我们发现,个体之间的总体敌对相互作用(55.4%)比中性相互作用(44.6%)更频繁发生,并且种间相互作用显示出比种内相互作用更大的敌对性(55.4%对36%)。在种内相互作用中,刺猬之间的相互作用最具敌对性(54.9%),獾之间的相互作用最少(6.7%)。相互作用的物种组成影响了敌对性,猫和狐狸之间的相互作用表现出最高水平(76.7%)。就总体“胜利”而言,即在获得花园资源方面,獾主导猫,猫主导或等同于狐狸,狐狸主导刺猬。然而,相对于猫而言,刺猬表现出更高的总体胜利比例(39.3%)。我们的研究结果在已记录的零散资源对城市野生动物行为的影响的背景下很重要,并且我们表明人为提供食物可能会导致意想不到的后果。我们建议采取行动,在空间和时间上减少群落竞争者的接近程度,以限制负面影响。