Suppr超能文献

膝关节骨关节炎的心理干预:系统评价与荟萃分析

Psychological intervention for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Isaji Yuichi, Kurasawa Yasuyuki, Sasaki Daisuke, Hayashi Masateru, Kitagawa Takashi

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Bukkyo University, Kyoto, Japan.

Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nagano University of Health and Medicine, Nagano, Japan.

出版信息

Psychol Health Med. 2025 Mar;30(3):636-662. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2025.2454039. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions compared to standard rehabilitation in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Given the recognized influence of psychological factors in OA management, the review assessed their impact on pain, functional disability, and self-efficacy. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, OpenGrey, and ClinicalTrials.gov, covering records from inception to September 2023. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that examined psychological interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and biofeedback in adults with knee OA diagnosed based on established clinical or radiological criteria. Studies with mixed populations were included only if at least 75% of participants had OA. Exclusion criteria included studies focused on surgical patients or individuals with systemic conditions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis). No restrictions were placed on intervention duration, allowing for a broad range of studies to be considered. From the 3,649 records identified, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 20 studies involving 3,138 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that psychological interventions led to significant improvements in pain (mean difference [MD]: -1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.61 to -0.46), disability and function (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.26; 95% CI: -0.38 to -0.15), and self-efficacy (SMD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.70). The strongest effects were observed in self-efficacy. However, concerns regarding methodological limitations, variability in intervention approaches, and high heterogeneity led to the evidence quality being rated as low to very low. This review underscores the potential benefits of psychological interventions in knee OA management, particularly for enhancing self-efficacy. Nonetheless, further high-quality research employing standardized protocols is needed to validate these findings and facilitate their clinical application.

摘要

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估与标准康复相比,心理干预对膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的有效性。鉴于心理因素在OA管理中的公认影响,该评价评估了其对疼痛、功能障碍和自我效能的影响。在多个数据库中进行了全面检索,包括PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Web of Science、OpenGrey和ClinicalTrials.gov,涵盖从创建到2023年9月的记录。符合条件的研究为随机对照试验,这些试验在基于既定临床或放射学标准诊断为膝OA的成年人中检验了认知行为疗法和生物反馈等心理干预。只有当至少75%的参与者患有OA时,才纳入混合人群的研究。排除标准包括专注于手术患者或患有全身性疾病(如类风湿性关节炎)个体的研究。对干预持续时间没有限制,从而可以考虑广泛的研究。从识别出的3649条记录中,70项研究符合纳入标准,20项涉及3138名参与者的研究被纳入荟萃分析。结果表明,心理干预导致疼痛(平均差[MD]:-1.04;95%置信区间[CI]:-1.61至-0.46)、残疾和功能(标准化平均差[SMD]:-0.26;95%CI:-0.38至-0.15)以及自我效能(SMD:0.49;95%CI:0.28至0.70)有显著改善。在自我效能方面观察到最强的效果。然而,由于方法学局限性、干预方法的变异性和高度异质性,证据质量被评为低到极低。本评价强调了心理干预在膝OA管理中的潜在益处,特别是对于提高自我效能。尽管如此,需要进一步采用标准化方案的高质量研究来验证这些发现并促进其临床应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验