Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点抑制剂联合紫杉烷类化疗用于晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌患者:不同程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达水平的系统评价和荟萃分析

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus taxane-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis across different PD-L1 expression levels.

作者信息

Abushanab Aws Khalid, Mustafa Mus'ab Theeb, Mousa Mahmoud Taysir, Albanawi Renad Fawwaz, Alkhalaileh Razan Mohammad, Alqudah Ghaith Nahar, Abu Zaina Razan Feras, Abu Sitta Zaina Ammar, Almasri Issa Mohammad, Abuquteish Dua

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.

Department of Microbiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2025 Feb;25(2):167-179. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2460537. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the primary approach for managing NSCLC. However, numerous combination therapies are currently under investigation. Our goal is to investigate the overall efficacy and safety of ICIs and taxane-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching web databases for relevant literature. We limited our eligibility to phase II/III randomized clinical trials involving advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis encompassing nineteen studies derived from sixteen RCTs. For patients with sq-NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50%, using ICIs plus taxane significantly improve PFS and OS with HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45-0.74,  < 0.0001) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.33-0.50,  < 0.00001), respectively. For patients with non-sq NSCLC PD-L1 1-49%, the analysis revealed significant improvement of OS and PFS with HR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47-0.88,  = 0.005) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.47-0.81,  = 0.0004), respectively. For TRAEs of all grades, ICIs plus taxane resulted with no significant difference compared to control group with risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.02).

CONCLUSION

The analysis revealed significant improvement in efficacy of ICIs with taxane in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients compared with ICI/taxane monotherapy. PROSPERO (CRD42023447532).

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是目前治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的主要方法。然而,目前有许多联合疗法正在研究中。我们的目标是研究ICIs与紫杉烷类化疗的总体疗效和安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,在网络数据库中搜索相关文献。我们将纳入标准限定为涉及晚期/转移性NSCLC患者的II/III期随机临床试验。

结果

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,纳入了来自16项随机对照试验(RCT)的19项研究。对于鳞状NSCLC(sq-NSCLC)患者且PD-L1≥50%,使用ICIs联合紫杉烷可显著改善无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),风险比(HR)分别为0.58(95%置信区间[CI],0.45-0.74,P<0.0001)和0.41(95%CI,0.33-0.50,P<0.00001)。对于非鳞状NSCLC患者且PD-L1为1%-49%,分析显示OS和PFS有显著改善,HR分别为0.64(95%CI,0.47-0.88,P=0.005)和0.62(95%CI,0.47-0.81,P=0.0004)。对于所有级别的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs),ICIs联合紫杉烷与对照组相比无显著差异,风险比(RR)为1.00(95%CI 0.99-1.02)。

结论

分析显示,与ICIs/紫杉烷单药治疗相比,ICIs联合紫杉烷在晚期/转移性NSCLC患者中的疗效有显著改善。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)(CRD42023447532)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验