Kawachi Hayato, Hata Tae, Yamada Tadaaki, Goto Yasuhiro, Amano Akihiko, Negi Yoshiki, Watanabe Satoshi, Furuya Naoki, Oba Tomohiro, Ikoma Tatsuki, Nakao Akira, Tanimura Keiko, Taniguchi Hirokazu, Yoshimura Akihiro, Fukui Tomoya, Murata Daiki, Kaira Kyoichi, Shiotsu Shinsuke, Hibino Makoto, Okada Asuka, Chihara Yusuke, Kijima Takashi, Takayama Koichi
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 May 30;14(5):1558-1568. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2024-1236. Epub 2025 May 22.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49%. However, older patients remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and optimal treatment strategies for this population remain unclear. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with either platinum-based chemotherapy alone (Chemo) or in combination with ICIs (ICI/Chemo) in older patients with NSCLC who have low PD-L1 expression.
This retrospective multicenter study included patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB-IV) with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49% from 19 Japanese institutions. We examined the relationship between baseline patient characteristics and treatment outcomes within each group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient characteristics between the ICI/Chemo and Chemo groups.
We evaluated data from 613 patients, finding that the ICI/Chemo group (n=370) exhibited significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the Chemo group (n=243). Among the 613 patients, 152 were aged ≥75 years. Of these, 63 received Chemo, while 89 underwent ICI/Chemo as first-line treatment. In this older cohort, ICI/Chemo significantly improved median PFS; however, no significant difference was observed in OS. Nonetheless, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events and pneumonitis of any grade was higher in the ICI/Chemo group compared to the Chemo group among older patients. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards models indicated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was significantly associated with PFS and OS. In older patients with ECOG PS 0, ICI/Chemo showed significant PFS benefits; in those with ECOG PS 1, both the PFS and OS were similar between the two groups.
ICI combined with chemotherapy may be a potentially effective treatment strategy for older patients with NSCLC and low PD-L1 expression. However, compared with the overall population, the benefits of adding ICI to chemotherapy were decreased, while the risk of toxicity may increase, making appropriate patient selection crucial for this population. Particularly, in patients with ECOG PS 1, the additional benefit of ICI over chemotherapy was minimal in terms of efficacy, suggesting that the introduction of ICI combined with chemotherapy should be carefully considered for this patient population.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合化疗已被证明在治疗程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分(TPS)为1%-49%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中有效。然而,老年患者在临床试验中的代表性仍然不足,该人群的最佳治疗策略仍不明确。本研究旨在评估一线治疗采用单纯铂类化疗(化疗组)或联合ICIs(ICI/化疗组)对PD-L1表达低的老年NSCLC患者的疗效和安全性。
这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了来自19家日本机构的诊断为晚期NSCLC(IIIB-IV期)且PD-L1 TPS为1%-49%的患者。我们检查了每组患者基线特征与治疗结果之间的关系。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于平衡ICI/化疗组和化疗组之间的患者特征。
我们评估了613例患者的数据,发现ICI/化疗组(n = 370)与化疗组(n = 243)相比,中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)显著更长。在这613例患者中,152例年龄≥75岁。其中,63例接受化疗,89例接受ICI/化疗作为一线治疗。在这个老年队列中,ICI/化疗显著改善了中位PFS;然而,OS未观察到显著差异。尽管如此,老年患者中,ICI/化疗组≥3级不良事件和任何级别的肺炎发生率均高于化疗组。使用Cox比例风险模型进行的多因素分析表明,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)与PFS和OS显著相关。在ECOG PS为0的老年患者中,ICI/化疗显示出显著的PFS获益;在ECOG PS为1的患者中,两组的PFS和OS相似。
ICI联合化疗可能是PD-L1表达低的老年NSCLC患者的一种潜在有效治疗策略。然而,与总体人群相比,化疗加用ICI的获益降低,而毒性风险可能增加,因此对该人群进行合适的患者选择至关重要。特别是,在ECOG PS为1的患者中,ICI相对于化疗在疗效方面的额外获益极小,这表明对于该患者群体,应谨慎考虑引入ICI联合化疗。