Riboli Andrea, Nardi Filippo, Osti Matteo, Cefis Mattia, Tesoro Gabriele, Mazzoni Stefano
MilanLab Research Department, A.C. Milan S.p.A., Milan, Italy.
Performance & Medicine Staff, A.C. Milan S.p.A., Milan, Italy; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Feb 1;39(2):249-259. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004995.
Riboli, A, Nardi, F, Osti, M, Cefis, M, Tesoro, G, and Mazzoni, S. Training load, official match locomotor demand, and their association in top-class soccer players during a full competitive season. J Strength Cond Res 39(2): 249-259, 2025-To examine training load and official match locomotor demands of top-class soccer players during a full competitive season and to evaluate their association. Twenty-five top-class soccer players competing in UEFA international competitions were included. The season was divided into 2 different categories: 2 matches (M2) or 3 matches (M3) in 8 days. Starters and nonstarters were classified. Total distance (TD), high-speed running (HSR, 15-20 km·h-1), very high-speed running (VHSR, 20.1-24 km·h-1), sprint (SPR, >24.1 km·h-1), and accelerations/decelerations (Acc + Dec, >3 m·s2) were recorded. Trivial to moderate differences (p < 0.05) in training load between M2 and M3 were found: HSR, VHSR, and SPR were higher in M2 than M3, whereas TD and Acc + Dec were higher in M3 than M2. Week-by-week variability in training load ranged from ∼16 to ∼59% depending on metrics. Official match locomotor demands were similar (p > 0.05) in M2 and M3 with ∼5 to ∼29% match-to-match variability depending on metrics. Total load (i.e., training plus match loads) was higher (p < 0.05, ES: 0.75/1.61) in starters than nonstarters, because of a higher match load and no difference in the training load. Very high-speed running and SPR accumulated during training sessions were largely to very largely (r = 0.60 to 0.72) associated with TD, HSR, VHSR, and Acc + Dec covered during official match; VHSR and TD during training were largely to very largely (r = 0.57 and 0.71) associated with SPR and Acc + Dec during official match. In conclusion, (a) congested periods seemed to not affect official match locomotor performance; (b) practitioners may consider high week-by-week workload variability for individualizing training prescriptions, especially for nonstarters; and (c) the VHSR and SPR accumulated during training were associated with the official match locomotor demands, and it may be considered for maximizing performance.
里博利、A、纳尔迪、F、奥蒂、M、切菲斯、M、特索罗、G和马佐尼、S。顶级足球运动员在一个完整赛季中的训练负荷、正式比赛中的运动需求及其关联。《力量与体能研究杂志》39(2):249 - 259,2025年 - 研究顶级足球运动员在一个完整赛季中的训练负荷和正式比赛中的运动需求,并评估它们之间的关联。纳入了25名参加欧洲足球协会联盟国际比赛的顶级足球运动员。赛季分为两种不同类型:8天内进行2场比赛(M2)或3场比赛(M3)。对首发球员和非首发球员进行了分类。记录了总距离(TD)、高速奔跑(HSR,15 - 20千米·小时)、极高速奔跑(VHSR,20.1 - 24千米·小时)、冲刺(SPR,>24.1千米·小时)以及加速/减速(Acc + Dec,>3米·秒²)。发现M2和M3之间的训练负荷存在微小到中等程度的差异(p < 0.05):M2中的HSR、VHSR和SPR高于M3,而M3中的TD和Acc + Dec高于M2。训练负荷的逐周变化范围根据指标在16%到59%之间。M2和M3中的正式比赛运动需求相似(p > 0.05),根据指标,比赛间的变化在5%到29%之间。由于比赛负荷较高且训练负荷无差异,首发球员的总负荷(即训练负荷加比赛负荷)高于非首发球员(p < 0.05,效应量:0.75/1.61)。训练期间积累的极高速奔跑和SPR与正式比赛中覆盖的TD、HSR、VHSR和Acc + Dec在很大程度上到非常大程度上相关(r = 0.60至0.72);训练期间的VHSR和TD与正式比赛中的SPR和Acc + Dec在很大程度上到非常大程度上相关(r = 0.57和0.71)。总之,(a)赛程密集期似乎不影响正式比赛的运动表现;(b)从业者在制定个性化训练处方时可考虑较高的逐周工作量变化,尤其是对于非首发球员;(c)训练期间积累的VHSR和SPR与正式比赛的运动需求相关,可考虑将其用于最大化表现。