Suppr超能文献

Improving flood-prone areas mapping using geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI): A non-parametric algorithm enhanced by math-based metaheuristic algorithms.

作者信息

Razavi-Termeh Seyed Vahid, Sadeghi-Niaraki Abolghasem, Ali Farman, Choi Soo-Mi

机构信息

Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering and Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drone, XR Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Convergence, College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 03063, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2025 Feb;375:124238. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124238. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

Abstract

Flooding presents substantial dangers to human lives and infrastructure, underscoring the need to map flood-prone areas to implement effective mitigation measures precisely. Although machine learning algorithms have made great strides, their accuracy in flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) remains limited due to data dependence, interpretability, and explainability issues, overfitting, generalization difficulties, and hyperparameter tuning. This study suggests combining the Decision Tree (DT) algorithm with advanced, math-based metaheuristic optimization algorithms to address these limitations. In this study, the FSM was prepared using a combination of the DT non-parametric algorithm and three math-based metaheuristic optimization algorithms, including the gradient-based optimizer (GBO), chaos game optimization (CGO), and arithmetic optimization algorithm (AOA). Four models were developed and compared for modeling and mapping: the basic DT, DT-AOA, DT-GBO, and DT-CGO. The DT-CGO model stood out on the training set, achieving the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.17. It was closely followed by DT-AOA (0.19), DT-GBO (0.2), and DT (0.201). In terms of mean absolute error (MAE), the DT-CGO model exhibited the lowest value of 0.06, followed by DT-AOA (0.07), DT-GBO (0.079), and the basic DT model (0.08). When considering the coefficient of determination (R), the DT-CGO model achieved the highest value of 0.871, followed by DT-AOA (0.853), DT-GBO (0.84), and DT (0.838). The enhanced models performed superior over the test set's basic DT model. The area under the curve (AUC) values validated the enhanced models' efficacy, with the DT-CGO model achieving the highest AUC of 0.978, followed by DT-AOA (0.974), DT-GBO (0.967), and DT (0.958). The findings emphasize the importance of accurate flood-prone area identification and provide valuable insights for policymakers to develop robust flood mitigation strategies.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验