Stegall China E, Tanner Lauren, Holcomb John B, Griffin Russell, Winkler Jon
Center for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Administration Bldg, Birmingham, Alabama.
Center for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Administration Bldg, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Surg Res. 2025 Feb;306:496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.032. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
The management of adhesive small-bowel obstruction (aSBO) continues to have wide variation, with no one management strategy accepted as the optimal. The first objective was to evaluate the methods of management and the variations in the management of aSBO at our institution and evaluate the outcomes of those management strategies. The second objective was to compare our outcomes to those of a published study by which patients were managed using an institutional protocol for aSBO.
A retrospective review of 465 patient encounters with a diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction from January 2019 to December 2020 was done. Data regarding implementation of nasogastric decompression, oral contrast administration, operative intervention, time to operation, length of stay, readmission, and mortality were collected and analyzed. These data were compared to a published protocol with outcomes of hospital length of stay, time to operation, and mortality. For comparative purposes, patient encounters were separated into one of four groups based on the administration of oral contrast and surgical intervention.
Among patients managed at our institution without protocol, 77% had nasogastric decompression, and 49% had oral contrast administration, with an average time to contrast of 34 hs. The operative rate was 23% at our institution without protocol compared to 56% at the institution with protocol. A decreased time to surgery was demonstrated in patients managed per institution protocol. Hospital length of stay was longer in three of four of the patient subgroups at the institution with protocol compared to our institution without protocol; however, a greater admission range was observed in patients managed without protocol. Overall mortality was less in patients managed without protocol at 1.3% compared to 2.9% in patients managed per protocol.
The implementation of clinical practice guidelines for aSBO could improve the uniformity of patient care, implement data-driven methods such as contrast administration, time to contrast administration, and decrease the length of time to operating room when patients are initially managed nonoperatively.
粘连性小肠梗阻(aSBO)的管理仍存在很大差异,没有一种管理策略被公认为是最佳的。第一个目标是评估我们机构中aSBO的管理方法和管理差异,并评估这些管理策略的结果。第二个目标是将我们的结果与一项已发表研究的结果进行比较,该研究中的患者使用机构aSBO方案进行管理。
对2019年1月至2020年12月期间465例诊断为小肠梗阻的患者进行回顾性研究。收集并分析了有关鼻胃管减压、口服造影剂使用、手术干预、手术时间、住院时间、再入院率和死亡率的数据。将这些数据与一项已发表方案的结果进行比较,该方案涉及住院时间、手术时间和死亡率。为了进行比较,根据口服造影剂的使用和手术干预情况,将患者分为四组之一。
在我们机构未采用方案管理的患者中,77%进行了鼻胃管减压,49%使用了口服造影剂,造影剂平均使用时间为34小时。我们机构未采用方案时的手术率为23%,而采用方案的机构为56%。采用机构方案管理的患者手术时间缩短。与我们未采用方案的机构相比,采用方案的机构中四个患者亚组中的三个住院时间更长;然而,未采用方案管理的患者入院范围更大。未采用方案管理的患者总体死亡率为1.3%,低于采用方案管理患者的2.9%。
实施aSBO临床实践指南可以提高患者护理的一致性,采用数据驱动的方法,如造影剂使用、造影剂使用时间,并在患者最初接受非手术治疗时缩短进入手术室的时间。