Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮与咪达唑仑作为心脏病患儿癫痫持续状态一线持续输注药物的比较

Ketamine Versus Midazolam as the First-Line Continuous Infusion for Status Epilepticus in Children with Cardiac Disease.

作者信息

Horvat David E, Keenan Julia S, Javadian Sam, Liu Yu-Ting, Voleti Shruthi, Staso Katelyn, Conley Caroline, Schlatterer Sarah D, Sansevere Arnold J, Harrar Dana B

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University School of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Division of Neurology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02212-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in children with cardiac disease is challenging given their often-tenuous hemodynamic state. We aim to determine whether ketamine is safe and effective in children with cardiac disease as the first-line continuous infusion for the treatment of refractory SE (RSE) and to compare ketamine to midazolam for the treatment of RSE in this population.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with cardiac disease and RSE admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit at a tertiary children's hospital between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2023. Consecutive patients < 18 years of age who had electroencephalogram-confirmed RSE treated with a continuous infusion of ketamine and/or midazolam were included. Clinical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record, and descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with cardiac disease and RSE were treated with a continuous infusion: 15 were treated with ketamine first, and 19 were treated with midazolam first. An equivalent number of patients in both groups required a single infusion for seizure cessation (11 [73%] in the ketamine group and 12 [63%] in the midazolam group; p = 0.72). The median time from seizure onset to seizure cessation, time from seizure onset to initiation of a continuous infusion, time from initiation of a continuous infusion to seizure cessation, infusion duration, and recurrence of seizures during weaning of the continuous infusion were comparable between groups. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who experienced potential adverse events attributable to their continuous infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective cohort study provides evidence that ketamine may be as effective as midazolam as the first-line continuous infusion for RSE in children with cardiac disease. This study also provides preliminary evidence of safety in this population, at least in comparison to midazolam.

摘要

背景

鉴于患有心脏病的儿童往往血流动力学状态不稳定,因此对他们进行癫痫持续状态(SE)的治疗具有挑战性。我们旨在确定氯胺酮作为治疗难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)的一线持续输注药物在患有心脏病的儿童中是否安全有效,并将氯胺酮与咪达唑仑用于该人群RSE的治疗进行比较。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2017年1月1日至2023年6月30日期间在一家三级儿童医院心脏重症监护病房住院的患有心脏病和RSE的儿科患者。纳入连续18岁以下经脑电图确诊为RSE且接受氯胺酮和/或咪达唑仑持续输注治疗的患者。从电子病历中提取临床变量,并进行描述性统计。

结果

34例患有心脏病和RSE的患者接受了持续输注治疗:15例首先接受氯胺酮治疗,19例首先接受咪达唑仑治疗。两组中需要单次输注以停止癫痫发作的患者数量相当(氯胺酮组11例[73%],咪达唑仑组12例[63%];p = 0.72)。两组之间从癫痫发作开始到癫痫停止的中位时间、从癫痫发作开始到开始持续输注的时间、从开始持续输注到癫痫停止的时间、输注持续时间以及在持续输注撤药期间癫痫复发情况相当。两组中因持续输注而发生潜在不良事件的患者比例没有差异。

结论

这项回顾性队列研究提供了证据,表明氯胺酮作为患有心脏病儿童RSE的一线持续输注药物可能与咪达唑仑一样有效。这项研究还提供了该人群安全性的初步证据,至少与咪达唑仑相比是这样。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验