Chung Douglas, Bakmiwewa Supun, Suthananthan Arul, Idrees Marwan
General Surgical Department, Liverpool Hospital, Corner of Elizabeth and Goulburn Street, Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170, Australia.
General Surgical Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Mar;95(3):321-327. doi: 10.1111/ans.19408. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
Post-operative pancreatic fistula is a common and morbid complication of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. While gastrointestinal anastomosis is typically performed using absorbable sutures, this issue has prompted experimentation with non-absorbable sutures. This study aims to assess the available literature to provide recommendations on suture choice in this anastomosis.
Two independent reviewers performed searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Review. References were screened for additional articles. Articles comparatively assessing suture choice in pancreaticojejunal anastomosis were included.
Of 2237 records screened, nine articles were included in this review. Suture materials assessed include polydioxanone, polyglactin 910, polyglycolic acid, polypropylene, polyester, silk, nylon, plain and chromic catgut, and polybutester. Clinical studies suggested polyester reduced rates of fistula formation. Ex vivo findings favoured polydioxanone and polyglactin 910. 5-0 was found to be favourable to 6-0 in duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with monofilament absorbable sutures. Barbed sutures were suggested to reduce fistula formation. Limitations were identified in many of the included articles.
There is limited research available on this topic, and it is not possible to strongly recommend any single suture as superior to others. Polyester is promising in clinical studies, and would benefit from further studies assessing validity. Polydioxanone and polyglactin 910 have rational indications for use. In particular, polydioxanone is suggested when poor healing is expected. Barbed sutures may reduce rates of fistula formation. More research is required to draw a strong conclusion.
术后胰瘘是胰空肠吻合术常见且严重的并发症。虽然胃肠吻合术通常使用可吸收缝线进行,但这一问题促使人们对不可吸收缝线进行试验。本研究旨在评估现有文献,为该吻合术中缝线的选择提供建议。
两名独立评审员对EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed、谷歌学术和Cochrane系统评价图书馆进行了检索。对参考文献进行筛选以查找其他文章。纳入比较评估胰空肠吻合术中缝线选择的文章。
在筛选的2237条记录中,本综述纳入了9篇文章。评估的缝线材料包括聚二氧六环酮、聚乳酸910、聚乙醇酸、聚丙烯、聚酯、丝线、尼龙、普通和铬制肠线以及聚丁酯。临床研究表明聚酯可降低瘘管形成率。体外研究结果支持聚二氧六环酮和聚乳酸910。在使用单丝可吸收缝线进行导管对黏膜吻合时,发现5-0比6-0更有利。倒刺缝线被认为可减少瘘管形成。许多纳入的文章都存在局限性。
关于这一主题的研究有限,无法强烈推荐任何一种缝线优于其他缝线。聚酯在临床研究中有前景,需要进一步评估其有效性的研究。聚二氧六环酮和聚乳酸910有合理的使用指征。特别是,预计愈合不良时建议使用聚二氧六环酮。倒刺缝线可能会降低瘘管形成率。需要更多研究才能得出有力结论。