• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为本科健康专业学生制定家庭健康史访谈方案:一项范围综述。

Creating a family health history interview protocol for use with undergraduate health professional students: A scoping review.

作者信息

Rooks Ronica N, Ford Cassandra D, Bennett Jenna, Braxton Tyrone

机构信息

Department of Health and Behavioral Sciences and the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Director for Online Education, University of Colorado Denver, 3023C North Classroom, P.O. Box 173364, Campus Box 188, Denver, CO, 80217-3364, USA.

The Capstone College of Nursing, The University of Alabama, P.O. Box 870358, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Dec 25;9:100568. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100568. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100568
PMID:39877313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11772959/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family health history can be used as a health promotion tool to assess health risk, improve data collection and disease prevention, initiate interventions, and motivate behavioral change, but its utility as a public health tool has not been fully explored. Collecting information for a family health history can be a challenging task. However, it is an important skill for undergraduate students to learn, particularly those in pre-health majors. Our aim was to create a family interview protocol for students' successful family health history collection using findings from students' research papers and a scoping review.

STUDY DESIGN

We summarized and listed suggestions from students' papers. Our scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) review process and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review checklist (2018).

METHODS

We used Medline, CINAHL (EBSCO), ERIC (ProQuest), Web of Science, and Academic Search Premiere databases and Google. Using Covidence, we included peer-reviewed, English, journal articles and grey literature, narrowing our key term combinations to terms like family health history, interview or protocol, and undergraduate or health professional student.

RESULTS

Protocol suggestions included having appropriate settings and preparation to conduct interviews with questions on socio-demographics, cultural and family relationship dynamics, health behaviors, and acute and chronic condition questions for family members. Students' papers addressed preparation for conducting interviews and obtaining better data from existing family trees and extended relatives to maximize learning about risk assessment. The scoping review revealed two themes associated with family health history, including creating genograms and interview methods used with history taking.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing the protocol for future assignments will provide students with a training opportunity to identify their own disease risks, improve their family health history knowledge, and collect family health history data relevant to prevention and interventions focused on understanding chronic conditions and their management.

摘要

背景

家族健康史可作为一种健康促进工具,用于评估健康风险、改进数据收集和疾病预防、启动干预措施以及激发行为改变,但其作为公共卫生工具的效用尚未得到充分探索。收集家族健康史信息可能是一项具有挑战性的任务。然而,对于本科生,尤其是健康相关专业预科的学生来说,这是一项需要学习的重要技能。我们的目标是利用学生研究论文的结果和一项范围综述,为学生成功收集家族健康史创建一份家庭访谈方案。

研究设计

我们总结并列出了学生论文中的建议。我们的范围综述遵循了阿克西和奥马利(2005年)的综述流程以及范围综述清单的PRISMA扩展版(2018年)。

方法

我们使用了医学文献数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL,EBSCO)、教育资源信息中心数据库(ERIC,ProQuest)、科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)、学术搜索高级版数据库(Academic Search Premiere)以及谷歌。通过Covidence软件,我们纳入了经过同行评审的英文期刊文章和灰色文献,并将关键术语组合缩小为家族健康史、访谈或方案以及本科生或健康专业学生等术语。

结果

方案建议包括具备适当的环境和准备工作,以便就社会人口统计学、文化和家庭关系动态、健康行为以及家庭成员的急慢性疾病问题进行访谈。学生论文讨论了进行访谈的准备工作,以及如何从现有的家族树和远亲那里获取更好的数据,以便最大限度地了解风险评估。范围综述揭示了与家族健康史相关的两个主题,包括创建系谱图以及病史采集时使用的访谈方法。

结论

在未来的作业中实施该方案将为学生提供一个培训机会,使其能够识别自身的疾病风险,增进对家族健康史的了解,并收集与预防和干预相关的家族健康史数据,这些预防和干预措施侧重于了解慢性病及其管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b31/11772959/afad79b1d121/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b31/11772959/afad79b1d121/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b31/11772959/afad79b1d121/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Creating a family health history interview protocol for use with undergraduate health professional students: A scoping review.为本科健康专业学生制定家庭健康史访谈方案:一项范围综述。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Dec 25;9:100568. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100568. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
How self-regulated learning influences undergraduate medical students to conduct student-centred learning: a scoping review protocol.自主学习如何影响本科医学生进行以学生为中心的学习:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e072675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072675.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
8
Use of active learning classrooms in health professional education: A scoping review.主动学习教室在卫生专业教育中的应用:一项范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Nov 16;6:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100167. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Suicide prevention for international students: a scoping review protocol.预防国际学生自杀:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e060266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060266.
10
Professional identity formation among undergraduate pre-medical students: a scoping review protocol.本科医学生专业身份认同的形成:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 23;12(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02329-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Experience and Perceptions of a Family Health History Risk Assessment Tool among Multi-Ethnic Asian Breast Cancer Patients.多民族亚洲乳腺癌患者对家族健康史风险评估工具的体验与认知
J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 19;11(10):1046. doi: 10.3390/jpm11101046.
2
Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.医生使用家族病史数据的策略:拥有数据并不等同于使用数据。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Oct 8;3(3):378-385. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa035. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences of Asians and Micronesian Islanders on Family Health History Genetic Cancer Screening Community Outreach.
亚洲人和密克罗尼西亚岛民对家族健康史遗传癌症筛查社区外展的看法、信念和经验。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Dec;36(6):1341-1353. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02085-0. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Barriers to family history knowledge and family communication among LGBTQ+ individuals in the context of hereditary cancer risk assessment.LGBTQ+ 个体在遗传性癌症风险评估背景下的家族病史知识和家族沟通障碍。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):230-241. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1476. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Formative Evaluation of the Families SHARE Disease Risk Tool among Low-Income African Americans.低收入非裔美国人 SHARE 疾病风险工具的形成性评价。
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):280-290. doi: 10.1159/000517309. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
6
The Role of Family Health History in Predicting Midlife Chronic Disease Outcomes.家族健康史在预测中年期慢性疾病结局中的作用。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
7
Family Health History-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature.基于家族健康史的干预措施:文献系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):445-454. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.022. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
8
An Integrative Review of Family Health History in Pediatrics.儿科中家庭健康史的综合回顾
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 Dec;59(14):1282-1287. doi: 10.1177/0009922820943474. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Evaluating a genomics short course for undergraduate health education students.为本科健康教育专业学生评估一门基因组学短期课程。
Per Med. 2020 Jul 1;17(4):295-306. doi: 10.2217/pme-2019-0120. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
10
Family health history: underused for actionable risk assessment.家族健康史:在可操作的风险评估中未得到充分利用。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):596-603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31275-9. Epub 2019 Aug 5.